1. Gavora P, Wiegerova A. Self-efficacy of students in a preschool education programme: The construction of a research instrument. New educational review. 2017; 47(1): 125-138. [Link] [ DOI:10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.10] 2. Vihang NV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5: A quick glance. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013; 55(3): 220-2. [Link] [ DOI:10.4103/0019-5545.117131] 3. Dehghani Y, Syed Ali A, Keykhosrovani M. Effectiveness of neuropsychological therapy on executive functions and educational performance of students with dyscalculia. J Child Ment Health. 2017; 2017: 14 -25. [Link] 4. Fifer SG. Integrating response to intervention (RTI) with neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. Psychol sch. 2008; 45(9): 812-825. [Link] [ DOI:10.1002/pits.20328] 5. Walk LM, Evers WF, Quante S, Hille K. Evaluation of a teacher training program to enhance executive unctions in preschool children. PloS one. 2018; 13(5): e0197454. [Link] [ DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197454] 6. Jacob R, Parkinson J. The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: Educ res rev. 2015; 85(4): 512-52. [Link] [ DOI:10.3102/0034654314561338] 7. Blair C. Executive function and early childhood education. Curr opin behav sci. 2016; 10: 102-107. [Link] [ DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.009] 8. Esbjorn BH, Normann N, Christiansen BM, Reinholdt-Dunne ML. The efficacy of group metacognitive therapy for children (MCT-c) with generalized anxiety disorder: An open trial J Anxiety disord. 2018; 53: 16-21. [Link] [ DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.11.002] 9. Kirk S, Gallagher JJ, Coleman MR. Educating exceptional children. Cengage Learning; 2014 pp: 45-48. [Link] 10. Shahaeian M, Shahim S, Bashash L,Yousefi F. Standardization of neuropsychology of conners questionnaire on 5-15 years old children. Journal of Psychological Studies. 2007; 3(3): 97-120. [Persian] [Link] 11. Sadeghi M, Kamkari K, Shokrzadeh SH. Psychometric properties of cognitives woodcock Johnson III Scales in elementary school students. Journal of psychometric. 2017; 6(22): 91-121. [Persian] [Link] 12. Woodcock RW, McGrew KS, Mather N. Woodcock-janson III diagnostic supplement to the tests of of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside; 2003. [Link] 13. Abedi A, Malekpour M, Oraizi H, Faramarzi S, Jamali Paghale S. Standardization of the neuropsychological test of NEPSY on 3-4 years old children. J Psychiatry & clin psychol. 2012; 18(1): 52-60. [Persian] [Link] 14. Movahedipoor R, Dortaj F, Nasri S, Asadzadeh H, Abolmaalialhoseyni KH. Constructing and validatimg of neropsychological test for diagnosis of non-verbal learning disorders for students of elementary schools. Journal of neropsycholoy. 2019; 5(1): 9-36. [Persian] [Link] 15. Martins PS, Barbosa-Pereira D, Valgas-Costa M, Mansur-Alves M. Item analysis of the Child Neuropsychological Assessment Test (TENI): Classical test theory and item response theory. Appl neuropsychol child. 2020; 18: 1-11. [Link] [ DOI:10.1080/21622965.2020.1846128] 16. McCloskey G, Petry B, McIntosh L, Kelly J, Filachek J. Neuropsychological assessment of preschool-Aged children. Psychoeducational Assessment of Preschool Children. Routledge; 2020, PP: 6-60. [Link] [ DOI:10.4324/9780429054099-15] 17. Baptista J, Osorio A, Martins EC, Verissimo M, Martins C. Does social-behavioral adjustment mediate the relation between executive function and academic readiness? J Appl dev psychol. 2016; 46: 22-30. [Link] [ DOI:10.1016/j.appdev.2016.05.004] 18. Luria AR. The making of mind: a personal account of soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press; 1979. 19. Leon CBR, Dias NM, Martins GLL, Seabra AG. Executive functions in preschool children: development and relationships with language and behavior. Psicol: Teor. Prat. 2018; 20(3): 121-137. [Link] [ DOI:10.5935/1980-6906/psicologia.v20n3p121-137] 20. Phillips D, Lipsey MW, Dodge KA, Haskins R, Bassok D, Burchinal MR, Duncan GJ, et al. Puzzeling it out: The current state of scientific knowledge on pre-Kindergarten effects A consensus statement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. 2017, pp: 19-30. [Link] 21. Creswell, JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications; 2017, pp: 12-16. [Link] 22. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research. 2001; 1(3): 385-405. [Link] [ DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307] 23. Braun V, Clarke V, Weate P. Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. Routledge; 2016, pp: 213-227. [Link] [ DOI:10.4324/9781315762012-26] 24. Klain RB. Priniples and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015. [Link] 25. Brace N, Kemp R, Snelgar R. Spss for psychologists. Psychology Press; 2016, pp: 132-152. [Link] [ DOI:10.1007/978-1-137-57923-2_6] 26. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers psychol. 1975; 28(4): 563-575. [Link] [ DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x] 27. Waltz CF, Bausell RB. Nursing research design statistics and computer analysis. FA Davis Company; 1981. 28. Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res social adm pharm. 2019; 15(2): 214-221. [Link] [ DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066]
|