[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 2 (Vol7 No2 Summer 2020- 2020) ::
J Child Ment Health 2020, 7(2): 294-311 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neurofeedback on Improving the Executive Functions in Children with Dyslexia
Nazanin Abbasi Fashami1 , Bahman Akbari * 2, Abbas Ali Hosseinkhanzadeh3
1- Ph.D. Student، Department oF Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2- Professor، Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3- Invited Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran and Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan. Rast, Iran and
Abstract:   (3716 Views)
Background and Purpose: Dyslexia as one of the most prevalent learning disabilities may cause many cases of academic failure in primary school students. During the recent years, several research and clinical methods have been used to treat children with this disability. Present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback on improvement of executive functions in children with dyslexia.
Method: This research was a quasi-experimental study with pretest-posttest control group design with 2-month follow-up period. The study population included all the 8 to 12-year old children with dyslexia who had referred to centers for learning disability in District 3 of Tehran in 2019, among which a sample of 36 students were selected by purposive sampling and then randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups or the control group. One of the experimental groups received eleven 60-min sessions of rehabilitation with working memory training software and the second experimental group received thirty 45- min sessions of neurofeedback intervention, whereas the control group received no intervention. All the three groups were assessed at the stages of pretest, posttest, and two-month follow-up period. To collect the data, Reading and Dyslexia Test (Karami Nouri & Moradi, 2008) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (Gerard et al., 2000) were used. Repeated measures analysis of variance were used to analyze the data.
Results: Results of data analysis indicated that cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback were significantly effective in improving the components of executive functions at both pretest and posttest stages (P<.05). Also, comparison of means showed that there was no significant difference between the cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback in terms of their effects on the components of executive functions (P>.05). However, scores of the experimental groups were significantly different from those of the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that cognitive rehabilitation by promoting the mental and intellectual abilities, and neurofeedback by providing positive and negative feedbacks and reinforce self-regulation can be effective in improving executive functions in children with dyslexia.
Keywords: Dyslexia, executive functions, cognitive rehabilitation, neurofeedback
Full-Text [PDF 1607 kb]   (1660 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/03/29 | Accepted: 2020/06/20 | Published: 2020/09/21
References
1. Ward A, Bush H, Braaten EB. Reading disorders/dyslexia. In: Wilson HK, Braaten EB, editors. The Massachusetts general hospital guide to learning disabilities: Assessing learning needs of children and adolescents. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019, pp: 21-37. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-98643-2_2]
2. Stoker G, Drummond K, Massengale C, Bahr C, Lin S, Vaughn S. Dyslexia and related disorders reporting study. American Institutes for Research; 2019. [Link]
3. Yousefi E, Faramarzi S, Malek Pour M, Yarmohammadian A. Comparison of the effect of executive functions training and barkley's model on reading performance and academic self-concept in students with dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health. 2020; 6(4): 51-62. [Persian]. [Link]
4. Javanmard G, Asadollahifam S. Comparison of executive functions of mathematical learning disabled children with reading, writing learning disabled and normal children. Neuropsychology. 2017; 3(10): 39-50. [Persian]. [Link]
5. Isquith PK, Roth RM, Gioia G. Contribution of rating scales to the assessment of executive functions. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2013; 2(2): 125-132. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/21622965.2013.748389]
6. Bull R, Lee K. Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Development Perspectives. 2014; 8(1): 36-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/cdep.12059]
7. Moin N, Asadi Gandomani R, Amiri M. The effect of neurofeedback on improving executive functions in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2018; 19(3): 220-227. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.32598/rj.19.3.220]
8. Yousefi R, Soleimani M, Ghazanfariyanpoor S. Comparison between switching and creativity among bilingual and monolingual children. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2017; 18(1): 1-12. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.21859/jrehab-18011]
9. Serpell ZN, Esposito AG. Development of executive functions: implications for educational policy and practice. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2016; 3(2): 203-210. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/2372732216654718]
10. Munro BA, Weyandt LL, Marraccini ME, Oster DR. The relationship between nonmedical use of prescription stimulants, executive functioning and academic outcomes. Addict Behav. 2017; 65: 250-257. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.023]
11. Mahmood Alilou M, Hashemi Nosratabad T, Fallahi A. Comparing executive functions inhibition response and sustained attention in children with learning disabilities in mathematics and normal children. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2015; 10(35): 27-36. [Persian]. [Link]
12. Hasanvandi S, Saleh Ardestani S, Ghazi Sh, Hasanvand B, Yadi F. Comparison of executive functions in students with and without specific learning disability with the characteristic reading and writing. Yafteh. 2017; 18(4): 30-39. [Persian]. [Link]
13. Mohamadi F, Karami J, Hashemi T. The effect of fernald multisensory and practice-repetition in the improvement of reading disabilities in school students. Journal of Psychological Achievements. 2011; 18(1): 169-190. [Persian]. [Link]
14. D'Mello AM, Gabrieli JDE. Cognitive neuroscience of dyslexia. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018; 49(4): 798-809. [Link] [DOI:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0020]
15. Wood RL, Fussey I. Towards a model of cognitive rehabilitation. In: Wood RL, Fussey I, editor. Cognitive rehabilitation in perspective. Routledge; 2018, pp: 3-26. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780429490088-2]
16. Baltaduoniene D, Kubilius R, Mingaila S. Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation for cognitive functions after stroke. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie. 2018; 81(3): 269-277. [Link] [DOI:10.14735/amcsnn2018269]
17. Balea M, Muresanu D, Alvarez A, Homberg V, Bajenaru O, Guekht A, et al. VaD - an integrated framework for cognitive rehabilitation. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2018; 17(1): 22-33. [Link] [DOI:10.2174/1871527317666180219164545]
18. Abbariki A, Yazdanbakhsh K, Momeni K. Investigating the effect of of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on reducing cognitive avoidance in Students with Specific Learning disorder. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2019; 9(33): 69-96. [Persian]. [Link]
19. Radfar F, Nejati V, Fathabadi J. The impact of cognitive rehabilitation on working memory and verbal fluency in dyslexic students (a single case study). Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2016; 11(40): 17-26. [Persian]. [Link]
20. Afshari A, Rezaei R. The effectiveness of Sand Smart software on executive functions (focused attention, the ability to organize and plan, and auditory and visual work memory) in students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2019; 8(3): 26-48. [Persian]. [Link]
21. Anjum A. Impact of cognitive remediation therapy on working memory, episodic memory, and attention in individuals with diagnosed or possible dyslexia [Doctoral Thesis]. [Dublin, Ireland]: School of Business, BA (Honours) in Psychology, National College of Ireland; 2019, pp: 1-11. [Link]
22. Akyurek G, Efe A, Kilic BG, Bumin G. The effect of cognitive therapy on executive functions and occupational routines in children with dyslexia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018; 99(10): e19. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.062]
23. Hosseinkhanzadeh A, Latif Zanjani M, Taher M. Efficacy of computer-assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) on improvement executive functions and reading performance of students with dyslexia. Neuropsychology. 2017; 2(7): 27-46. [Persian]. [Link]
24. Aghaei Sabet SS, Banijamali S, Dehshiri G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation of verbal and visuospatial working memory in improving the mathematical performance of students with dyscalculia. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2018; 18(2): 5-22. [Persian]. [Link]
25. Bayrami M, Movahedi Y, Ahmadi E. The effectiveness of cognitive rehab on the selective- divided attention and working memory in students with dyslexia & dyscalculia disabilities. Neuropsychology. 2017; 3(8): 9-28. [Persian]. [Link]
26. Shaw DR. A systematic review of pediatric cognitive rehabilitation in the elementary and middle school systems. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016; 39(1): 119-123. [Link] [DOI:10.3233/NRE-161343]
27. Azizi A, Drikvand FM, Sepahvandi MA. Comparison of the effect of cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback on sustained attention among elementary school students with specific learning disorder: a preliminary randomized controlled clinical trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018; 43(4): 301-307. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10484-018-9410-8]
28. Seilsepour M, Hamounpeyma E, Pirkhaefi A. The effect of Neurofeedback therapy sessions on female elementary students with attention deficit and Hyperactivity in Varamin city, in 2013. Navid No. 2015; 18(60): 24-33. [Persian]. [Link]
29. Brandeis D. Neurofeedback training in ADHD: More news on specificity. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011; 5(122): 856-857. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.011]
30. Marzbani H, Marateb HR, Mansourian M. Neurofeedback: A comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016; 7(2): 143-158. [Link] [DOI:10.15412/J.BCN.03070208]
31. Cruz-Rodrigues C, Barbos T, Toledo-Piza CMJ, Miranda MC, Buen OFA. Neuropsychological characteristics of dyslexic children. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2014; 27(3): 539-546. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/1678-7153.201427315]
32. Hojabrnia R, Tahmasebi Boroujeni S. Improvement of visual and spatial memory as a result of neurofeedback with an emphasis on decreasing beta wave and increasing SMR wave. Neuropsychology. 2018; 4(13): 21-34. [Persian]. [Link]
33. Sharifi K, Babamir H. Efficacy of neurofeedback on Brain executive functions in children with mathematics disorder. Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2018; 7(6): 17-34. [Persian]. [Link]
34. Bruno B-V, Diego FR-R, Blanca T-C, Alvaro A-R, Gonzalo S-VJ. Neurofeedback training system with audiovisual stimuli for the attention state induction during cognitive processes [Conference Paper]. [Mexico City, Mexico]: 14th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE); 2017, pp: 1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ICEEE.2017.8108883]
35. Eroğlu G, Aydın S, Çetin M, Balcisoy S. Improving cognitive functions of dyslexies using multi-sensory learning and EEG neurofeedback [Conference Paper]. [Izmir, Turkey]: 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU); 2018, pp: 1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/SIU.2018.8404711]
36. Nazari M, Taghizadeh S, Jahan A, Hashemi T, Mirnassab M. The effectiveness of neurofeedback training in reading performance and phonological awareness in dyslexic students. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches. 2014; 9(35): 189-210. [Persian]. [Link]
37. Sabaghi A, Rezaee M, Mirzakhani N, Irani A, Tabatabaee SM. Effectiveness of neurofeedback training on reading performanceand working memory in students with dyslexia. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017; 6(3): 11-20. [Persian]. [Link]
38. Heydarinasab L, Madani AS, Yaghoubi H, Rostami R, Kazemi R. The effectiveness of neurofeedback with computrized training in improving working memory in adults with attention deficit disorder/ hyperactivity. Yafteh. 2016; 18(1): 101-112. [Persian]. [Link]
39. Narimani M, Mohajeri Aval N, Ensafi E. Examining the effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment in brainwave, executive function and math performance of children with specific learning disorder with mathematics specifier. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2017; 6(3): 122-142. [Persian]. [Link]
40. Vosooghifard F, Alizadeh Zarei M, Nazari MAl, Kamali M. The effect of neurofeedback training and neurofeedback with occupational therapy based on cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions in autistic children. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2013; 7(2): 28-34. [Persian]. [Link]
41. Sahragard M, Alipour A, Zare H, Roshan R, Moodi M. Effectiveness of powell's cognitive rehabilitation with neurofeedback in improving executive functions, memory, and attention to veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Iranian Journal of War and Public Health. 2018; 10(4): 187-193. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.29252/ijwph.10.4.187]
42. Heidari T, Amiri S, Molavi H. Effectiveness of Davis dyslexia correction method on reading performance of dyslexic children. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012; 6(2): 41-58. [Persian]. [Link]
43. Rezaei A, Kermanizadeh R. The effect of reciprocal teaching on comprehension and reading improvement in fifth grades of elementary female students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2015; 4(4): 49-65. [Persian]. [Link]
44. Nodei K, Sarami G, Keramati H. The relation between function and working memory capacity and Students' reading performance: The role of age, sex and intelligence. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2016; 4(3): 11-20. [Persian]. [Link]
45. Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen PJ, Johnson M, Gustafsson P, Dahlström K, et al. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005; 44(2): 177-186. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010]
46. Hamzeloo M, Mashhadi A, Salehi-Fadardi J. The effectiveness of inhibition and working memory training on adhd and comorbid symptoms of prison inmates with adult attention deficithyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2014; 6(1): 1-13. [Persian]. [Link]
47. Stevens J P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Fifth Edition. Routledge; 2012. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203843130]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbasi Fashami N, Akbari B, Hosseinkhanzadeh A A. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Neurofeedback on Improving the Executive Functions in Children with Dyslexia. J Child Ment Health 2020; 7 (2) :294-311
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1070-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 2 (Vol7 No2 Summer 2020- 2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645