[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 3 (Vol6 No3 Fall 2019 - 2019) ::
J Child Ment Health 2019, 6(3): 295-306 Back to browse issues page
The Effectiveness of Mind Theory Training based on the Hall and Tager-Flusberg Model and Role Playing on Improving the Theory of Mind in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Fereshteh Yaghooti1 , Sogand Ghasemzadeh * 2, Zahra Ahmadi3
1- Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, University of Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Psychology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (6527 Views)
Background and Purpose: Children with autism spectrum disorder are not only unable to understand the minds of others, but also have underlying problems in understanding that others may have different minds. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of mind theory training on promoting theory of mind in children with autism.
Method: This study was an experimental study with a pretest-posttest design with a control group. 12 children with autism spectrum disorder (age range 7 to 10 years) were selected using convenience sampling and were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. The theory of mind was taught to the experimental group for 25 sessions and the control group did not receive the training. At the end both groups were evaluated in post-test. The research instrument consisted of theory of mind test (Steirnman, 1999, Iranian standard form,2006). The data were analyzed using covariance analysis.
Results: The results of the data analysis showed that the intervention program was able to increase the mean of the subscales of theory of mind in the experimental group (p <0.001), while the Post-test scores of the control group in all subscales did not change significantly.
Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that training the theory of mind increase the ability to recognize and represent emotions (first level of theory of mind), understanding of primary false belief (second level of theory of mind), and an understanding of secondary false belief (third level of theory of mind) in children with autism. The implications of the results are discussed in the paper.
 
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder, theory of Mind, levels of theory of mind
Full-Text [PDF 778 kb]   (1667 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/10/26 | Accepted: 2019/09/21 | Published: 2019/11/16
References
1. Ambridge, B., Bannard, C., & Jackson, G. H. Is grammar spared in autism spectrum disorder? Data from judgments of verb argument structure overgeneralization errors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2015; 45(10), 3288-3296. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10803-015-2487-5]
2. Baron-Cohen, S., Bowen D. C., Holt, R. J., Allison, C., Auyeung, B., Lombardo M. V., et al. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~ 400 Men and Women with Autism. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10(8): e0136521. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0136521]
3. Devlin H. C., Zaki J., Ong, D C., & Gruber, J. Not as good as you think? Trait positive emotion is associated with increased self-reported empathy but decreased empathic performance. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(10). [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0110470]
4. Mariano M., Pino M. C., Peretti S., Valenti M., & Mazza M. Understanding criminal behavior: Empathic impairment in criminal offenders. Social Neuroscience. 2016; doi:10.1080/1 7470919.2016.1179670. [Link]
5. Cavallo A., Koul A, Ansuini C, Capozzi, F, Becchio C. Decoding intentions from movement kinematics. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6(1):370-385. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/srep37036]
6. Semin GR. Communications language as an implementation device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2000; 30(5): 545-612. [Link] https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<595::AID-EJSP23>3.0.CO;2-A [DOI:10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:53.0.CO;2-A]
7. Boraston Z, Blakemore S, Chilvers R, Skuse D. Impaired sadness recognition is Linked to social interaction deficit in autism. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(7):1501‐1510. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.010]
8. Huijnen CAGJ, Lexis MAS, Jansens R, de Witte LP. How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. J Autism DevDisord. 2017;21(2): 1-18. [Link]
9. Astington J.W., Harris P.L., & Olson D.R. Developing theories of mind. 1988; New York: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
10. Carruthers P. Language, thought and consciousness: an essay in philosophical psychology.1998; 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
11. Baron Cohen S. Mind blindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. 1995; Cambridge: MIT Press. [Link] [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001]
12. Franco F., Itakura S., Pomorska K., Abramowski A., Nikaido K., & Dimitriou D. Can children with autism read emotions from the eyes? The eyes test revisited. Research in Developmental Disabilities - Journal. 2014; 3(5), 1015-1026. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.037]
13. Tager-Flusberg H. A psychological approach to understanding the social and language impairments in autism. Int Rev Psychiatry. 1999; 11(4): 325-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09540269974203]
14. Demetriou A., Mouyi A., & Spanoudis G. The development of mental processing. Journal of Autism & developmental Disorder. 2010; 21, 254-268. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9780470880166.hlsd001010]
15. Moore S. Asperger Syndrome and the Elementary School Experience. Shawnee Mission Kansas. Publishers cataloging-in Publication. 2002. (Provided by quality books, Inc). [Link]
16. Xin JF, Sutman FX. Smart board in teaching Social Stories to students with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2011; 43(4): 18-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/004005991104300402]
17. Pino M C., Tempesta D., Catalucci A., Anselmi M., Nigri A., Iaria G., et al. Altered Cortico-Limbic Functional Connectivity During an Empathy Task in subjects with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Journal Psychopathological Behaviour Assessment. 2016; doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9538-x. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10862-016-9538-x]
18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-V, 5th edn. Arlington,VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
19. Folstein SE, Rosen-Sheidley B. Genetics of autism: complex etiology for a heterogeneous disorder. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2(12): 943-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/35103559]
20. Conti D, Di Nuovo S, Buono S, Trubia G Di Nuovo A. Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A pilot study in a clinical setting. 2015; 14(1):176-191. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333589]
21. Volkmar FR, Pauls D. Autism. Lancet. 2003; 362(9390): 1133-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14471-6]
22. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism DevDisord. 2004; 34(2): 163-75. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00]
23. Dunn W, Myles BS, Orr S. Sensory processing issues associated with Asperger syndrome: a preliminary investigation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2002; 56(1):97-102. [Link] [DOI:10.5014/ajot.56.1.97]
24. Valle, A., Massaro, D., Castelli, I., and Marchetti, A. Theory of mind development in adolescence and early adulthood: the growing complexity of recursive thinking ability. Euro. J. Psychol. 2015; 11, 112-124. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i1.829 [Link] [DOI:10.5964/ejop.v11i1.829]
25. Baron-Cohen S. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2002; 6(6):248-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6]
26. Robins B, Dautenhahn K. Tactile Interactions with a Humanoid Robot: Novel Play Scenario Implementations with Children with Autism. International Journal of Social Robotics. 2014; 11(1):160-175. [Link]
27. Baron‐Cohen S, Golan O, Ashwin E. Can emotion recognition ne taught to children with autism spectrum conditions? Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences. 2009; 364(1535): 3567‐3574. [Link] [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2009.0191]
28. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition. 1985; 21(1): 37-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8]
29. Klin A, Jones W, Schultz R, Volkmar F. The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions B. 2003; 358(1430):345-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2002.1202]
30. Allen B, Timmer S, Urquiza A. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for sexual concerns of maltreated children: A preliminary investigation. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2016; 56(3): 80-88. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.04.008]
31. Fisher N, Happé F, Dunn J. The relationship between vocabulary, grammar, and false belief task performance in children with autistic spectrum disorders and children with moderate learning difficulties. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005;46(4):409-19. 17. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00371.x]
32. Gevers C, Clifford P, Mager M, Boer F. Brief report: a theory-of-mind-based social cognition training program for school-aged children with pervasive developmental disorders: an open study of its effectiveness. J Autism DevDisord.2006; 36(4):567-71. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10803-006-0095-0]
33. Begum M, Serna RW, Yanco HA. Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. Int J Soc Robot. 2016; 8(4): 157-181. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12369-016-0346-y]
34. Nieter L, Thornberry T, Brestan-Knight E. The effectiveness of group parent-child interaction therapy with community families. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2013; 22(4): 490-501. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10826-012-9601-5]
35. Seyfi R, Salehi Omran E, Panahandeh Vanesfaghi K. Effectiveness theory of mind on the promotion of the theory of mind of children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Empowering Children, Vol. 6, No. 2 (14), Summer 2015, 1-8. [Link]
36. AdibSareshki, Narges; Pourmohammad Reza Tajrishi, Masoomeh; AbdollahZadeh Rafi, Mehdi. The Effect of Teaching Theory of Mind on Improving Adaptive Behavior of Mentally Retarded Students. Research project of University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2010. [Persian] [Link]
37. Ghamarani O, Alborz E. The validity and reliability test" theory of mind in a group of students with mental retardation and normal city. Journal of Psychology. 2006; 10: 199-181. [Persian] [Link]
38. Hale, C.M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: a train study. Development science, 3, 346-359. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1467-7687.00289]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yaghooti F, Ghasemzadeh S, Ahmadi Z. The Effectiveness of Mind Theory Training based on the Hall and Tager-Flusberg Model and Role Playing on Improving the Theory of Mind in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Child Ment Health 2019; 6 (3) :295-306
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-303-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 3 (Vol6 No3 Fall 2019 - 2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645