1. Rojalai A, Susaie JS, Balaraman L, Manoharan SR, Mustafa Z, Hashim H. Language Learning Strategies Used for Enhancing Reading Skills Among Year 6 Pupils of A Primary School in Selangor. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2021; 11(6): 1186-1195. [Link] [DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10044]

2. American Psychiatric Association, DS, & American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]

3. Hallahan D.P, Lloyd J.W, Kauffman J.M, Weiss M.P, Martinez E.A. Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching. Alizadeh H, Hemmati G, Rezaii S, SHojaii S. (Persian translator). Tehran; 2013, Arasbaran [Persian]. [Link]

4. Meltzer L. (Ed). Executive function in education: From theory to practice. Guilford Publications; 2018, pp: 29-38. [Link]

5. Arroyo-Anlló EM, Sánchez JC, Ventola ARM, Ingrand P, Neau JP, Gil R. Procedural Learning Improves Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. (Preprint). 2020; 1-12. [Link] [DOI:10.3233/JAD-191083]

6. Simor P, Zavecz Z, Horvath K, Elteto N, Torok C, Pesthy O, Nemeth, D. Deconstructing procedural memory: Different learning trajectories and consolidation of sequence and statistical learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019; 2708. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02708]

7. Ullman MT. The declarative/procedural model: a neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In Neurobiology of language. 2016; 953-968. Academic Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6]

8. Knowlton B, Siegel A, Moody T. Procedural Learning in Humans. 2017; 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21085-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21085-7]

9. Li T. Exploring the Usage of Multiple Learning Systems in Learning to Read, Doctoral Dissertations. University of Connecticut Graduate School; 2019. [Link]

10. Arciuli J. The multi-component nature of statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences. 2017 [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2016.0058]

11. 372(1711): 20160058. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0058. [Link] [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2016.0058]

12. Metivier A. The Magnetic Memory Method Masterclass Product Page. 2021; [Link]

13. Maehler C, Joerns C, Schuchardt K. Training Working Memory Of Children With And Without Dyslexia. Children. 2019; 6(3): 47. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/children6030047]

14. Sawi OM, Rueckl J. Reading and the neurocognitive bases of statistical learning. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2019; 23: 8-23. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2018.1457681]

15. Witteloostuijn M, Tirza G. Examining the contribution of statistical learning to grammar and literacy acquisition-A study of Dutch children with and without dyslexia (Doctoral dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics). 2020. [Link]

16. West G, Shanks DR. Hulme CH. Sustained Attention, Not Procedural Learning, is a Predictor of Reading, Language and Arithmetic Skills in Children, Scientific Studies of Reading. 2020; 25(1): 47-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2020.1750618]

17. Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ, Dean P. Developmental dyslexia: The cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends in Neurosciences. 2011; 24, 508-511. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01896-8]

18. Bogaerts L, Szmalec A, Hachmann WM, Page MP, Duyck W. Linking memory and language: Evidence for a serial-order learning impairment in dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2015; 43(44):106-122. Doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.012. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.012]

19. Lum JA, Ullman MT, Conti-Ramsden, G. Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Research in developmental disabilities. 2013; 34(10): 3460-3476. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017]

20. Frith U. Teaching in 2020: The impact of neuroscience. Journal of Education for Teaching. 2005; 31(4): 289-291. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02607470500280118]

21. Frost R, Siegelman N, Narkiss A, Afek L. What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language? Psychological Science. 2013; 24(7): 1243-1252. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0956797612472207]

22. Gingras M, Sénéchal M. Evidence of statistical learning of orthographic representations in grades 1-5: The case of silent letters and double consonants in French. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2019; 23(1): 37-48. [link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2018.1482303]

23. Rahmanian S, Kuperman V. Spelling errors impede recognition of correctly spelled word forms. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2018; 23(1): 24-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2017.1359274]

24. Steacy LM, Compton DL, Petscher Y, Elliott JD, Smith K, Rueckl J, Pugh K. Development and prediction of context-dependent vowel pronunciation in elementary readers. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2018; 23(1): 49-63. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1466303. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2018.1466303]

25. Qi Z, Sanchez Araujo Y, Georgan WC, Gabrieli JD, Arciuli J. Hearing matters more than seeing: A cross-modality study of statistical learning and reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2019; 23(1): 101-115. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2018.1485680]

26. van der Kleij SW, Groen MA, Segers E, Verhoeven L. Sequential implicit learning ability predicts growth in reading skills in typical readers and children with dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2018; 23(1): 77-88. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10888438.2018.1491582]

27. Westendorp M, Hartman E, Houwen S, Huijgen B, Smith J, Visscher CA. longitudinal study on gross motor development in children with learning disorders. Research in developmental disabilities. 2014; 35(2): 357-363. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.018]

28. imani M, alizadeh H, kazemi F, ghobari bonab B. Developing Direct Instruction program and evaluation of its effectiveness on math problem solving skills in students with Learning Disorder. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2017; 6(24): 1-29. doi: 10.22054/jpe.2017.21514.1547. [Persian]. [Link]

29. Bemana S, Ghamarani A, Naderi F, Asgari P, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. Effect of Response to Intervention on the Reading Performance of the Students with Reading Disability. MEJDS. 2017; 7: 92-92 [Persian]. [Link]

30. Cox-Magno NZ. Metacognitive reading strategy and emerging reading comprehension in students with intellectual disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). 2018. [Link] [DOI:10.5590/JERAP.2018.08.1.14]

31. Stievano G, Pace G, Colombo A, Antonietti A. Cognitive Processes Underlying Reading Improvement during a Rhythm-Based Intervention. A Small-Scale Investigation of Italian Children with Dyslexia. Children. 2019; 6(8): 91. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/children6080091]

32. Leloup G, Anders R, Charlet V, Eula-Fantozzi B, Fossoud C, Cavalli E. Improving reading skills in children with dyslexia: efficacy studies on a newly proposed remedial intervention-repeated. 2021. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11881-021-00222-4]

33. Nabifar S, Raghibdoost S. Phonological and Syntactic Processing in Models of Reading. JOEC. 2010; 10 (3): 283-298. [Persian]. [Link]

34. Sandelowski M, Barros J. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company Inc.2007. [Link]

35. Zimmer L. Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006; 5(3): 311-318. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x]

36. nazari S, saberi A, taheri H, rohbanfard H. The Role of working memory capacity on the learning the relative timing a motor task: Emphasis on implicit and explicit approaches. JCP. 2018; 6 (2):11-20. [Persian]. [Link]

37. Williams JN. The neuroscience of implicit learning. Language Learning. 2020; 70(S2): 255-307. ‌[Link] [DOI:10.1111/lang.12405]

38. Moradi M, mirbod S. The Effectiveness of Training of Jager's knowledge and Metacognitive Skill Program on Improving Neuropsychological skills in Students with Dyslexia. Neuropsychology. 2020; 6(1): 17-30. doi: 10.30473/clpsy.2020.47488.1451 [Persian]. [Link]

39. Zarenezhad S, Soltanikouhbanani S, Zarenezhad S. Effectiveness of Neurofeedback on Cognitive Deficits and Visual - Motor Perception in student with Dyslexia. Neuropsychology. 2020; 6(2): 47-66. Doi: 10.30473/clpsy.2020.47676.1453. [Persian].[Link]

40. Toreyfi hosseini H, Shehni yailagh M, Haji Yakhchali A, allipour S. Effectiveness of Empowerment Program Based on Self Regulation Executive Functions on Reading Performance of Dyslexic Primary School Students. Neuropsychology. 2019; 5(17): 25-42. doi: 10.30473/clpsy.2019.43901.1392 [Persian]. [Link]

41. Zarenezhad S, soltanikouhbanani S, Karshki H. The Effectiveness of Self-Regulatory Learning Strategies on Working Memory and Inhibiting the Response of Dyslexic Students. Neuropsychology. 2019; 5(18): 109-130. doi: 10.30473/clpsy.2019.44880.1409 [Persian]. [Link]

42. Ranjbar M, basharpoor S, sobhi gharamaleki N, Narimani M. Comparing the Effectiveness of computerized cognitive rehabilitation and neuropsychological exercises on Improving working memory and continuous attention in students with dyslexia. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2019; 9(34): 111-135. doi: 10.22054/jpe.2019.44751.2029 [Persian]. [Link]

43. Hariri P, Saberi H, Abolmaali K. The impact of phonological awareness training on working memory in children with reading. Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2019; 21(2): 52-60. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.30699/icss.21.2.52]

44. Anjum A. Impact of Cognitive Remediation Therapy on Working Memory, Episodic Memory, and Attention in individuals with diagnosed or possible dyslexia (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland). 2019. [Link]

45. Dushanova J, Lalova Y, Kalonkina A. Protocol for Visual Intervention of Developmental Dyslexia. 2021. [Link]