[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
International Editorial Board
Editorial Board of Iranian University
Aims & Scopes
Indexing & Abstracting
Open Access Policy
Financial Policies
CrossMark Policy
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Instructions for Authors
Submission Form
Principles of Publishing Ethics
Ethical Code: Psychologic Study
Ethical Code: Medical Research
Ethical Consideration
Peer Review Policy
Declaration Form
Article Processing Charges
For Reviewers::
Policies of Peer Review
Registration::
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 1 (Vol9 No1 Spring2022- 2022) ::
J Child Ment Health 2022, 9(1): 158-175 Back to browse issues page
Determination of Psychometric Indicators and Standardization of Intelligence Test of Children’s Raven Colored Progressive Matrices in Elementary School Students
Ali Rasouli Foshtami1 , Touraj Hashemi * 2, Azar Kiamarsi1 , Azra Ghaffari1
1- Department of Psychology, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (1883 Views)
Background and Purpose: The Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices test is one of the valid IQ tests that is used to measure general intelligence (general factor). The Children's Colored version of this test is a useful tool for measuring 6 to 11 year old children. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric indicators and standardization of this test to assess the intelligence of elementary school students in Rasht.
Method: The present study was a standardization study. In this study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the validity of the scale. In order to estimate the parameters, the method of Weighted Least Square Mean and Variance Adjusted (WLSMV) with M-Plus 7.4 software was used. For this purpose, from the statistical population of elementary school students in Rasht who were studying in the academic year 2020-21 (N=48500), a sample of 1643 students were selected via random clustering method from privileged and semi-privileged areas and were tested. Assessment tools included Raven’s 36-item Colored Progressive Matrices (1949) and the non-verbal part of the fifth edition Stanford Binet IQ scale (2011).
Results: Findings of the validity of the test showed a positive and significant correlation between the Children's Raven Colored Progressive Matrices scales and Stanford Binet (P<0.001, r=0.758), which indicates the favorable validity of the Children's Raven Colored Progressive Matrices Scale. Also, in evaluating the reliability of the Children's Raven Colored Progressive Matrices scales by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest in total and by gender, the obtained coefficients in the whole scale and by gender were more than 0.7. Also, using the standard score calculation method (z scores), the IQ equations of students in 6 grades of boys and girls (grades 1 to 6) on the Stanford-Binet IQ scale with an average of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 were obtained.
Conclusion: The Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices is a good tool for measuring general intelligence. It is necessary to determine local norms for testing the intelligence of Colored Progressive matrices and the appropriateness of non-verbal psychometric tests in order to identify students with learning disabilities.
Article number: 10
Keywords: chometric indices, intelligence test, Raven’s colored progressive matrices, standardization
Full-Text [PDF 1693 kb]   (602 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/11/11 | Accepted: 2022/02/27 | Published: 2022/06/19
References
1. Ayati M, Asadi YM, Azadegan A. Confirmatory factor analysis of the inentification scale of gifted students. . jem.atu.ac.ir. 2017; 27(7): 161-181.‌ [Persian] [Link]
2. Fischer C, Müller K. Gifted education and talent support in Germany. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. 2014;4(3):31-54. [Link] [DOI:10.26529/cepsj.194]
3. Cotton SM, Kiely PM, Crewther DP, Thomson B, Laycock R, Crewther SG. A normative and reliability study for the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and individual differences. 2005;39(3):647-659. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.015]
4. Raven J. The Raven's progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive psychology. 2000;41(1):1-48. [Link] [DOI:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735]
5. Rindermann H. Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for the economic welfare of people. Intelligence. 2008;36(2):127-142. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.002]
6. Raven JC, Court JH. Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales: Oxford pyschologists Press Oxford; 1998. [Link]
7. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications, Canadian Studies in Population 45; 2015, PP: 188-195. [Link] [DOI:10.25336/csp29418]
8. Tzuriel D. Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. 2000;12(4):385-435. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1009032414088]
9. Kambiz K. The New version of Tehran- Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales Practical Manual (TSB-5). second, editor. Tehran: Madares Karamad; 2012. 3 p. [Persian]. [Link]
10. Bildiren A. Reliability and Validity Study for the Coloured Progressive Matrices Test between the Ages of 3-9 for Determining Gifted Children in the Pre-School Period. Journal of education and training studies. 2017;5(11):13-20. [Link] [DOI:10.11114/jets.v5i11.2599]
11. Na SD, Burns TG. Wechsler intelligence scale for children-V: Test review. Applied Neuropsychology: Child. 2016;5(2):156-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/21622965.2015.1015337]
12. Castellano JA, Diaz EI. Reaching New Horizons: Gifted and Talented Education for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students: ERIC; 2002. [Link]
13. Lohman DF, Korb KA, Lakin JM. Identifying academically gifted English-language learners using nonverbal tests: A comparison of the Raven, NNAT, and CogAT. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2008;52(4):275-296. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0016986208321808]
14. Öner N. Türkiye'de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler, İstanbul, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları. 1997; 3. Basım: 10.39. [Link]
15. Lynn R, Hampson S. The rise of national intelligence: Evidence from Britain, Japan and the USA. Personality and individual differences. 1986;7(1):23-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90104-2]
16. Lynn R, Vanhanen T. Intelligence: A unifying construct for the social sciences: Ulster Institute for Social Research; 2012. [Link]
17. Rushton JP, Skuy M, Bons TA. Construct validity of Raven's advanced progressive matrices for African and non‐African engineering students in South Africa. International journal of selection and assessment. 2004;12(3):220-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00276.x]
18. Bakhiet SFA, Lynn R. A standardization of the colored progressive matrices in Tripoli, Libya. Mankind Quarterly. 2015;56(1):79. [Link] [DOI:10.46469/mq.2015.56.1.6]
19. Meisenberg G, Lynn R. Intelligence: A measure of human capital in nations. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies. 2011;36(4):421. [Link]
20. Schweizer K, Goldhammer F, Rauch W, Moosbrugger H. On the validity of Raven's matrices test: Does spatial ability contribute to performance? Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;43(8):1998-2010. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.008]
21. August JO. A Normative Study of the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices for South African Children with Cognitive Barriers to Learning: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; 2017. [Link]
22. Rajabi G. Normalizing the Raven coloure progressive matrices test on students of city Ahvaz. Contemporary Psychology. 2008;3(1):23-32. [Persian] [Link]
23. Roid GH, Pomplun M. The stanford-binet intelligence scales: The Guilford Press; 2012; 2012. [Link]
24. Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino A. Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. [Link]
25. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological methods. 2004;9(4):466. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466]
26. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research. 1981;18(1):39-50. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/002224378101800104]
27. Hair Jr JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European business review. 2014. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128]
28. Kline R. Data preparation and psychometrics review. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford New York, NY; 2016, 4th ed. pp. 64-96. [Link]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rasouli Foshtami A, Hashemi T, Kiamarsi A, Ghaffari A. Determination of Psychometric Indicators and Standardization of Intelligence Test of Children’s Raven Colored Progressive Matrices in Elementary School Students. J Child Ment Health 2022; 9 (1) : 10
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1215-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 1 (Vol9 No1 Spring2022- 2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645