The role of brain-behavioral systems and impulsivity (five-factor model) in predicting the violence of student with history of violence in schools

Ataee, Naier; Zeinali, Ali

doi:10.61186/jcmh.11.2.6

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Open Access

Registered in

Indexing and Abstracting

wwww.magiran.com
scholar.google.com
www.sid.ir
...

Volume 11, Issue 2 (Vol11 No2 Summer 2024- 2024)

J Child Ment Health 2024, 11(2): 70-84

Back to browse issues page

The role of brain-behavioral systems and impulsivity (five-factor model) in predicting the violence of student with history of violence in schools

Naier Ataee¹

, Ali Zeinali ^*²

1- Department of Psychology, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khoy, Iran

Abstract: (2067 Views)

Background and Purpose: Various factors can play a role in violence in schools and students. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the role of brain-behavioral systems and impulsivity (five-factor model) in predicting violence among students with a history of violence in schools.
Method: The present research method is descriptive and correlational. The statistical population of this research was the students in the second year of high school with a history of violence in schools in the academic year of 2020-2021 in the city of Urmia. There were 245 of which 150 were selected as a case sample by random cluster sampling. Gary–Wilson Personality Questionnaire (Wilson et al., 1989), Impulsive Behavior Scale (Whiteside and Lynam, 2001), and Conflict Tactics Scale (Strauss, 1979) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation and stepwise regression analysis.
Results: The research results showed a positive and significant relationship between BAS and violence (r = 0.40, p<0.01), and there was a negative and significant relationship between BIS and violence (r = -0. 25 p<0, 01). Also, there is a positive and significant relationship between impulsivity and components of positive urgency (r = 0.19), negative urgency (r = 0.35), lack of perseverance (r = 0.37), and lack of Premeditation (r = 0.26) and Sensation seeking (r = 0.16) with violence (p > 0.01 and p<0.05). On the other hand, the results of the step-by-step regression analysis showed that the variables of BAS and BIS, negative urgency, and lack of perseverance can significantly predict 36% of the changes in violence in students.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, it can be concluded that BAS/BIS and impulsivity play an important role in predicting student violence in schools. The findings of the present study can significantly help mental health professionals in formulating and implementing preventive and therapeutic interventions for violent students.

Article number: 5

Keywords: Brain-behavioral systems, impulsivity, students, violence

Full-Text [PDF 1477 kb] (2555 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/10/29 | Accepted: 2024/09/23 | Published: 2024/09/23

References

1. Refahi Z, Dastan N, Ashrafi H. Prediction of Aggression in Children based on Domestic Violence and Communication Patterns. J Child Ment Health 2020; 7 (2) :55-65. [Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jcmh.7.2.6 [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.7.2.6]

2. Bergsmann EM, Van De Schoot R, Schober B. The effect of classroom structure on verbal and physical aggression among peers: a short-term longitudinal study. Journal Sch Psychol. 2013 [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.10.003]

3. 51: 159-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp. 2012.10.003 [Link]]

4. Yarigholi B, Herfati Sobhani M, Ghsabzadeh J, Rahimi H. Teachers' experiences of the underlying factors of violence in schools, a phenomenology study. New Thoughts on Education. 2018; 14(1): 159-170. [Persian] https://doi.org/ 10.22051/jontoe.2018.10043.1283 [Link] [DOI:10.22051/jontoe.2018.10043.1283 [Link]]

5. Parsamehr M, Saeidi Madani SM, Divband F. The Relationship between Social Link Established by Family and Interpersonal Violence of Male Juveniles in Yazd. Journal of Family Research. 2010; 6(1): 71-86. [Persian] [Link]

6. Ammermueller A. Violence in European schools: A widespread phenomenon that matters for educational, Labour Economics Journal. 2012; 19: 908- 922.https://doi. org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.08.010 [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.labeco.2012.08.010]

7. Hobbs ME. Peer influence on deviant behavior. Department of psychology, Miami University; 2008. [Link]

8. Ghaderzadeh O, Ghaderi B. Multilevel Analysis of Violence: Study Survey of Male and Female College Students of Saqqez. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Researches on Social Issues of Iran. 2016; 5(12): 61-80. [Persian] [DOI:10.22108/ssoss.2016.20950 [Link]]

9. Fontaine RG. Applying systems principles to models of social information processing and aggressive behavior in youth, Journal of Aggression and violent behavior. 2006; 11: 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.003 [Link]]

10. Jaśko K, Czernatowicz-Kukuczka A, Kossowska M, Czarna AZ. Individual differences in response to uncertainty and decision making: The role of behavioral inhibition system and need for closure. Motivation and Emotion. 2015; 39(4): 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9478-x [DOI:10.1007/s1 1031-015-9478-x [Link]]

11. Kobeleva X, Seidel EM, Kohler C, Schneider F, Habel U, Derntl B. Dissociation of explicit and implicit measures of the behavioral inhibition and activation system in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research. 2014; 218(1-2): 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.027 [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2014 .04.027 [Link]]

12. Corr PJA. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity, Pers Indiv Differ. 2019; 33: 511-532. [DOI:10.101 6/S0191-8869(01)00170-2 [Link]]

13. Kakabraee, K., AZAMI, E. The distress tolerance prediction model based on brain behavioral systems and poor emotional regulation. Quarterly Journal of Health Breeze, 2017; 54: 7-11https://jfh.sari.iau.ir/article_653745. html?lang=en [Link]

14. Park SM, Park YA, Lee HW, Jung HY, Lee J-Y, Choi J-S. The effects of behavioral inhibition/approach system as predictors of Internet addiction in adolescents, Personality Indivioal Differ. 2013; 54: 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.033 [DOI:10.101 6/j.paid.2012.07.033 [Link]]

15. Mohammadzadeh Ebrahimi A, Rahimi Pordanjani T, Khorasaninia A. The role of brain-behavioral systems in predicting risky behaviors of high school students in Bojnourd. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2015 Jun 10;7(1):175-88. [Persian] http://dx.doi .org/10.29252/jnkums.7.1.175 [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jnkums.7.1.175]

16. Gudiño, O.G., Nadeem, E., Kataoka, S.H. et al. Reinforcement Sensitivity and Risk for Psychopathology Following Exposure to Violence: A Vulnerability-Specificity Model in Latino Youth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 43, 306-321 (2012). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10578-011-0266-x [Link] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0266-x [DOI:10.1007/s10578-011-0266-x [Link]]

17. Komasi S, Saeidi M, Soroush A, Zakiei A. The relationship between brain behavioral systems and the characteristics of the five factor model of personality with aggression among Iranian students. Journal of injury and violence research. 2016 Jul;8(2):67. https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v8i2.696 [DOI:10.5249%2Fjivr.v8i2.696 [Persian] [Link]]

18. O'Connor RM, Colder CR. Predicting alcohol patterns in first year college students via motivational systems and reasons for drinking, Psychol Addict Behav. 2005; 19: 10-20.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.10 [Link] [DOI:10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.10]

19. Ayoublo Z, Arvin S. The role of prejudice, resilience and behavioral activation / inhibition systems (BAS / BIS) in predicting impulsive behavior in fathers with a history of physical violence against children. Rooyesh 2021; 9 (11): 111-120.http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2383353.1399.9. 11.12.5 [Persian] [Link]

20. Hamidi M, Shariat S, Aghabozorgi S, Keshavarz Mohammadi R. The effectiveness of child-based mindfulness program on impulsivity and aggression in children with externalizing disorders. Quarterly journal of child mental health. 2020 Jan 10; 6(4):144-55. [Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jcmh.6.4.14 [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.6.4.14]

21. Lauriola M, Weller J. Personality and risk: Beyond daredevils-risk taking from a temperament perspective. Psychological perspectives on risk and risk analysis: theory, models, and applications. 2018:3-6.http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-319-92478-6_1. [Link]

22. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001; 30(4): 669-689.http://dx.doi.org/1 0.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7 [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7]

23. Lynam D, Smith G, Whiteside S, Cyders M. The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior (Technical Report). West Lafayette: Purdue University; 2006. [Link]

24. Delazar E, Hadianfard H, Aflakseir A, Kousha M. The effectiveness of mindfulness and modification therapy on impulsivity and risk-taking behaviors in adolescents with attention deficithyperactivity disorder. J Child Ment Health. 2022; 9 (1):100-118. [Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/ jcmh.9.1.8. [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jcmh.9.1.8]

25. Maneiro L, Gómez-Fraguela JA, Cutrín O, Romero E. Impulsivity traits correlates of antisocial behavior in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017; 104: 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.045 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.045 [Link]]

26. Mehdiani Z, Farzadi F, Faramarizi H. The causal relationship between family violence (physical violence and emotional violence) and social variables (neighborhood structure and school participation) with the antisocial behavior of boys in correctional centers with the mediation of impulsivity, self-control and boldness. New Psychological Research Journal. 2017; 13(49): 187-214. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27173852.1397 13.49.9.7 [Link]

27. Jones ShE, Miller JD, Lynam DR. Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Criminal Justice. 2011; 5: 1-9. [DOI:10.1016 /j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004 [Link]]

28. Asadi Majreh S, Akbari B. Structural Model Aggression according to Emotion Regulation, Alexithymia, Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking in Students. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. 2018; 25(6): 819-828.https://jsums.medsab.ac.ir/article_1144.html?lang=en [Persian] [Link]

29. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 1970 Sep;30(3):607-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [DOI:10.1 177/001316447003000308. [Link]]

30. Strauss, Anselm L & Corbin, Juliet M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Qrounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, SAGE Publications, 1998. [Link]

31. Chalabi M, Rasul-zadeh Aghdam S. Effects of family order and conflict on violence against children. Iranian Journal of Sociology. 2007; 4(2): 26-54. [Persian] [Link]

32. Wilson GD, Barrett PT, Gray JA. Human reactions to reward and punishment: A questionnaire examination of Gray's personality theory. British Journal of Psychology. 1989 [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02339.x]

33. 80: 509-515. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295. 1989.tb02339.x [Link]]

34. Mosalman A, Hoseini A, Sadeghpoor M. Prediction of Addiction Readiness Based on Behavioral Activation and Inhibition of Systems (BIS / BAS) and Cognitive Abilities Among Students in Amol Institute of Higher Education 2017-2018. Military Care Sciences. 2018; 5 (2). 146-155. [Persian]. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/mcs.5.2.146 [Link] [DOI:10.29252/mcs.5.2.146]

35. Lynam D, Smith G, Whiteside S, Cyders M. The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior (Technical Report). West Lafayette: Purdue University; 2006.10. [Link]

36. Jabraili H, Moradi A, Habibi. Psychometric characteristics and factor structure of the Persian version of the five-factor scale of impulsive behavior. Journal of Methodological Methods and Models. 2017; 9(31): 174-190. [Persian] https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285516.1397.9.31.11.1

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.61186/jcmh.11.2.6

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Ataee N, Zeinali A. The role of brain-behavioral systems and impulsivity (five-factor model) in predicting the violence of student with history of violence in schools. J Child Ment Health 2024; 11 (2) : 5
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1318-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 11, Issue 2 (Vol11 No2 Summer 2024- 2024)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710