[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 2 (Vol12 No2 Summer 2025- 2025) ::
J Child Ment Health 2025, 12(2): 51-69 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of the effectiveness of multisystemic therapy and schema therapy based on mothers' training on interpersonal reactivity in adolescent girls with psychopathic behaviors
Mahnaz Shahbazpour1 , Seyedeh Maryam Mousavi *2 , Samereh Asadi Majreh3
1- Department of Psychology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2- Department of Health Psychology, Ra.C., Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3- Department of Psychology, Ra.C., Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (389 Views)
Background and Purpose: Recent studies show that adolescents showing psychopathic behaviors experience difficulties in interpersonal reactivity. So, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Multisystemic Therapy (MST) and Schema Therapy (ST) based on mothers' training on interpersonal reactivity in adolescent girls with psychopathic behaviors.
Method: This quasi‑experimental study employed a pretest-posttest method, including two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population consisted of all tenth- and eleventh-grade students from four public high schools for girls in Karaj City during the 2023–2024 academic year. From a total of 520 students, thirty adolescents with psychopathic behaviors—identified using a cut-off score of 27 on the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale—were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups (10 participants in each group). The first experimental group received twelve weekly sessions of MST, while the second experimental group took part in twelve weekly group sessions of ST. Meanwhile, the control group continued to receive the regular educational programs provided by their school. Data collection tools included the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRPS; Levenson, 1995) and the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Questionnaire (DIRQ; Davis, 1983). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and Bonferroni post-hoc tests with SPSS- 24.
Result: The findings showed that both MST and ST based on mothers' training were effective in improving interpersonal reactivity compared to the control group (P<0/001). However, MST had a greater effect than ST in enhancing interpersonal reactivity among adolescent girls with psychopathic behaviors (P<0/001).
Conclusion: Based on the results, MST is a more effective approach for addressing the psychological consequences in students with psychopathic behaviors. Therefore, these interventions can be used as complementary methods alongside other therapeutic and preventive programs.
Article number: 4
Keywords: Psychopathic behaviors, multisystemic therapy, schema therapy, interpersonal reactivity, adolescent girls
Full-Text [PDF 1501 kb]   (119 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/05/9 | Accepted: 2025/07/8 | Published: 2025/08/9
References
1. Maurer JM, Anderson NE, Allen CH, Kiehl KA. Examining the association between psychopathic traits and fearlessness among maximum-security incarcerated male adolescents. Children. 2024;11(1): 65. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/children11010065]
2. Fanti KA, Lordos A. Age patterns in psychopathic traits from age 9 to age 20: Testing unique associations with conduct disorder symptoms. Curr Psychol. 2022; 41(9): 6452-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12144-020-01150-z]
3. Gillespie SM, Jones A, Garofalo C. Psychopathy and dangerousness: An umbrella review and meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review. 2023; 100: 102240. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102240]
4. Sanz-García A, Peña Fernández ME, García-Vera MP, Sanz J. Prevalence of psychopathy in a community sample of Spanish adults: Definitions and measurements matter. Front Psychol. 2022; 13: 997303. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997303]
5. Pinheiro M, Gonçalves RA, Cunha O. Emotional Processing and Psychopathy Among Women: A Systematic Review. Deviant Behavior. 2024; 45(10): 1366- 90.1390. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01639625.2023.2295527]
6. Sica C, Perkins ER, Joyner KJ, Caudek C, Bottesi G, Caruso M, Giulini P, Ghisi M, Patrick CJ. Testing for sex differences in the nomological network of the triarchic model of psychopathy in incarcerated individuals. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2021; 43(4): 960-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10862-021-09897-w]
7. Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 44(1): 113-26. [Link] [DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113]
8. Gupta MD, Basu A, Thakurta R. Re-examining the relationship between interpersonal reactivity index sub-scales and mental well-being: Implications of the pandemic. Acta Psychologica. 2022; 228(8): 362-371. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103621]
9. Li B, Weng Y. Prompt-based system for personality and interpersonal reactivity prediction. Software Impacts. 2022; 12: 100296. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100296]
10. Hollarek M, Lee NC. Current understanding of developmental changes in adolescent perspective taking. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022; 45:101308. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101308]
11. Chen WL, Liao WT. Emotion regulation in close relationships: The role of individual differences and situational context. Frontiers in psychology. 2021; 28: 12:697901. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697901]
12. Branchadell V, Poy R, Ribes-Guardiola P, Segarra P, Moltó J. Psychopathic callousness and perspective taking in pain processing: An ERP study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2024; 19(1): nsae022. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsae022]
13. Burghart M, Mier D. No feelings for me, no feelings for you: A meta-analysis on alexithymia and empathy in psychopathy. Pers Individ Dif. 2022; 194: 111658. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111658]
14. Kim EL, Gentile DA, Anderson CA, Barlett CP. Are mindful people less aggressive? The role of emotion regulation in the relations between mindfulness and aggression. Aggress Behav. 2022; 48(6): 546-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ab.22036]
15. Salekin RT, Grant JC, Bellamy NA, Salekin TL. Psychopathy and conduct disorder. Encyclopedia of adolescence. Springer Nature. 2023; 978(3)319-32132-5 [Link]
16. Henggeler SW. Multisystemic therapy: An overview of clinical procedures, outcomes, and policy implications. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review. 1999; 4(1):2-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S1360641798001786]
17. Littell JH, Pigott TD, Nilsen KH, Green SJ, Montgomery OL. Multisystemic Therapy® for social, emotional, and behavioural problems in youth age 10 to 17: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021; 17(4): e1158. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/cl2.1158]
18. Bjørknes R, Hukkelberg S, Taraldsen K, Høstmælingen AT. Does Multisystemic Therapy Change Criminogenic Risk Factors? A 10-Year Study Among Norwegian Youths with and Without Offenses. Crime & Delinquency. 2024; 0(0). [Link] [DOI:10.1177/00111287241287134]
19. Satodiya R, Bied A, Shah K, Parikh T, Ash P. A systematic review of multisystemic therapy in adolescent sex offenders. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024; 52(1): 51-60. [Link]
20. Hosseini Fayyaz MB, Atef Vahid MK, Asgharnejad Farid AA. Effectiveness of a Multisystemic Therapy-based intervention in treating non-suicidal self-injury behaviors and conduct problems in a male adolescent: A case report. (IJPCP). 2024; 30: E4600. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.32598/ijpcp.30.4600.1]
21. Waaler, P.M., Bergseth, J., Vaskinn, L. et al. Identification of treatment elements for adolescents with callous unemotional traits: a systematic narrative review. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 202; 18: 110. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13034-024-00792-2]
22. Fonagy P, Butler S, Cottrell D, Scott S, Pilling S, Eisler I, Fuggle P, Kraam A, Byford S, Wason J, Smith JA. Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): 5-year follow-up of a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, superiority trial. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 ;7(5): 420-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30131-0]
23. Bernstein DP, Keulen-de Vos M, Clercx M, De Vogel V, Kersten GC, Lancel M, et al. Schema therapy for violent PD offenders: A randomized clinical trial. Psychol Med. 2023; 53(1): 88-102. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0033291721001161]
24. Assmann A, et al. The effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy compared to schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: A randomized clinical trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2024; 93(4): 249-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1159/000538404]
25. Mohammad Hasani S, Askary P, Heidarie A, Ehtesham Zadeh P. Comparison of the Effectiveness of "Parent Management Training" and "Group Schema Therapy" for Parents on Academic Motivation and Oppositional Defiance of Their Teenage Children with Conduct Disorder. JHPM 2021; 10 (4): 83-95. [Persian] [Link]
26. Sabzi N, Farah Bijari A, Khosravi Z. The effectiveness of group schema therapy-based parenting education of mothers on modifying maladaptive schemas of the child and improving the quality of the parent-child relationship. JPCP. 2022; 10(1): 33-44. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.32598/jpcp.10.1.798.1]
27. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. guilford press; 2006 Nov 3.[Link]
28. Joas J, Möhler E. Maternal bonding in early infancy predicts childrens' social competences in preschool age. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021; 12: 687535. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.687535]
29. Motevally Joybari F, Bakhshipour Joybari B, Abbasi G. Compare the effectiveness of maternal training based on attachment-based intervention and cognitive-behavioral intervention on multiple dimensions of anxiety in children with separation anxiety disorder. J Child Ment Health. 2025; 11 (4): 69-90 [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.11.4.69]
30. Giahi Z, Sadoughi M, Tamanneifar M. The effectiveness of self-compassion training on cognitive emotion regulation and distress tolerance in mothers of children with intellectual disability. J Child Ment Health 2024; 11(3): 4 [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.11.3.5]
31. Khani R, Abedi A, Javadzadeh Shahshahani F. Effectiveness of mothers' wise parenting training on the psychological well-being of preschool children. J Child Ment Health 2024; 11(3): 1 [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.11.3.2]
32. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2020 Apr 1. 778 - 780. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781003117452]
33. Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM. Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. APAPSYc. 1995; 68(1): 151-68. [Link] [DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.151]
34. Anestis JC, Green BA, Arnau RC, Anestis MD. Psychopathic personality traits in the military: An examination of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scales in a novel sample. SAGE J. 2017;26(4): 43-56 [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1073191117719511]
35. Garofalo C, Noteborn MG, Sellbom M, Bogaerts S. Factor structure and construct validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP): A replication and extension in Dutch nonclinical participants. Journal of personality assessment. 2019 Sep 3;101(5):481-92. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00223891.2018.1519830]
36. Gholami F, Zarei E, Mohammadi K. Development and Effectiveness of a Parent-Adolescent Relationship Training Program Based on the Dark Triple Traits of Military Parent Personality and the Parent-Child Relationship on the Dark Triplet of Parent Personality. Jmp . 2022; 13(49): 11-38. [Persian] [Link]
37. Péloquin K, Lafontaine MF. Measuring empathy in couples: Validity and reliability of the interpersonal reactivity index for couples. Journal of personality assessment. 2010 Feb 16;92(2):146-57.k. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00223890903510399]
38. Hosseinverdi M, Pourassadi Z, Keshavarz S, Kakavand A. Effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy on self-esteem, empathy, and forgiveness in child labor. J Child Ment Health. 2021; 7(4): 181-96 [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jcmh.7.4.12]
39. Amirkhanloo A, Dousti Y, Donyavi R. The Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy with Emotional Intelligence Training on Social Adjustment in Adolescents with Conduct Disorder. JAFT. 2022; 3(4): 217-42. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.61838/kman.aftj.3.4.13]
40. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975; 28(4). [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahbazpour M, Mousavi S M, Asadi Majreh S. Comparison of the effectiveness of multisystemic therapy and schema therapy based on mothers' training on interpersonal reactivity in adolescent girls with psychopathic behaviors. J Child Ment Health 2025; 12 (2) : 4
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1502-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 2 (Vol12 No2 Summer 2025- 2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4718