1. Hesampour F, Rezaei AM. The Role of Academic Motivation, Academic Emotions, and Moral Intelligence in Predicting Students' Academic Performance. J Child Ment Health. 2024; 10 (4): 78-63. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.10.4.6]

2. Hesampour F, Rezaei A M. Predicting Students' Academic Flourishing based on the Moral Intelligence: The Mediating Role of Academic Motivation, Academic Emotions, Academic Procrastination and Academic Burnout. J Child Ment Health. 2023; 10 (2): 83-103. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.10.2.7]

3. Khajeh Hosseini H, Farrokhi N, Asadzadeh H. Comparison of Moral Reasoning among Students with and without Visual Impairment. J Child Ment Health. 2019; 6 (2): 194-204. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.6.2.17]

4. Piaget J. The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press; 1965. [Link]

5. Kohlberg L. The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row; 1981. [Link]

6. Flatebø S, Tran VNN, Wang CEA, Bongo LA. Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2024;19(5): e0303704. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303704]

7. Szczuka JM, Strathmann C, Szymczyk N, Mavrina L, Krämer NC. How do children acquire knowledge about voice assistants? A longitudinal field study on children's knowledge about how voice assistants store and process data. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2022; 33:100460. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100460]

8. UNICEF. Policy guidance on AI for children. Version 2.0. New York: UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy; 2021. [Link]

9. Andries V, Robertson J. Alexa doesn't have that many feelings: children's understanding of AI through interactions with smart speakers in their homes. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023; 5: 100176. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100176]

10. Dangol A, Zhao R, Wolfe R, Ramanan T, Kientz JA, Yip J. "AI just keeps guessing": Using ARC puzzles to help children identify reasoning errors in generative AI. In: Proceedings of the 24th Interaction Design and Children Conference. 2025; 444-464. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3713043.3728836]

11. Collyer-Hoar G, Rubegni E, Malinverni L, Yip J. "It's kind of weird talking to a sphere": exploring children's hopes and fears on social robot morphology using speculative research methods. In: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2024; 276-288. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3643834.3661526]

12. Jiao J, Afroogh A, Rosner G. LLMs and childhood safety: ethical risks and safeguards for generative AI in children's lives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11242. 2025. [Link]

13. Ethical Considerations from Child-Robot Interactions in Under-Resourced Contexts S, Krahmer E, Swerts M. Child-robot interaction across cultures: how does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? Comput Human Behav. 2014; 40: 86-100. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.043]

14. Manzi F, Peretti G, Di Dio C, Itakura S, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Marchetti A. Cross-cultural moral judgments and emotions in preschoolers: human and robot transgressions in Japan and Italy. Behav Inf Technol. 2025; 44(14): 1-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2025.2477779]

15. McStay McStay A, Rosner G. Emotional artificial intelligence in children's toys and devices: ethics, governance and practical remedies. Big Data Soc. 2021; 8(1):1-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/2053951721994877]

16. Adams Adams C, Pente P, Lemermeyer G, Rockwell G. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023; 4:100131. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131]

17. UNESCO. Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. [Link]

18. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(10):1435-1443. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1049732312452938]

19. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372 (71): 1-9. [Link]

20. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12 (181): 1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181]

21. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8 (45): 1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45]

22. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8]

23. Berson IR, Berson MJ, Luo W. Innovating responsibly: ethical considerations for AI in early childhood education. AI Brain Child. 2025; 1(2): 1-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s44436-025-00003-5]

24. Kosoy E, Jeong S, Sinha A, Gopnik A, Kraljic T. Children's mental models of generative visual and text-based AI models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13081. 2024. [Link]

25. Livingstone S, Blum-Ross A. Parenting for a digital future: how hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190874698.001.0001]

26. Malinverni L, Schaper MM, Rubegni E, Tamashiro MA. Scaffolding children's critical reflection on intelligent technologies: opportunities from speculative fiction. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2025; 43:100727. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100727]

27. Sharma Sharma S, Iivari N, Ventä-Olkkonen L, Hartikainen H, Kinnula M. Inclusive child-centered AI: employing design futuring for inclusive design of inclusive AI by and with children in Finland and India. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08041. 2023. [Link]

28. Schmuecker S, Hourcade JP, Alper M, Fails JA, Kawas S, Yarosh S. Democratizing the ethics of emerging technologies for children. Interactions. 2024; 31(5): 32-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3686703]

29. Dwivedi U, Elsayed-Ali S, Bonsignore E, Kacorri H. Examining the values reflected by children during AI problem formulation. arXiv [Preprint]. 2023 Sep 27 [cited 2025 Sep 27]. [Link]

30. Chubb J, Missaoui S, Concannon S, Maloney L, Walker JA. Interactive storytelling for children: A case-study of design and development considerations for ethical conversational AI. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2022; 32:100403. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100403]

31. Rubegni, E., Malinverni L, Yip J. "Don't let the robots walk our dogs, but it's ok for them to do our homework": Children's perceptions, fears, and hopes in social robots. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 2022; New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. 352-361. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3501712.3529726]

32. Quander K, Milky TR, Aponte N, Caceres Carrascal N, Woodward J. "Are you smart?": Children's understanding of "smart" technologies. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 2024; New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. 625-638. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3628516.3655787]