[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
International Editorial Board
Editorial Board of Iranian University
Aims & Scopes
Indexing & Abstracting
Open Access Policy
Financial Policies
CrossMark Policy
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Browse by Authors
Browse by Keywords
For Authors::
Instructions for Authors
Submission Form
Principles of Publishing Ethics
Ethical Code: Psychologic Study
Ethical Code: Medical Research
Ethical Consideration
Peer Review Policy
Declaration Form
Article Processing Charges
For Reviewers::
Policies of Peer Review
Registration::
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 3 (Vol12 No3 Fall 2025- 2025) ::
J Child Ment Health 2025, 12(3): 79-100 Back to browse issues page
Representation of the role of smart technologies in the moral development of children with an emphasis on education and upbringing: a systematic meta-synthesis
Mohammad Hassani1 , Taiebeh Yeganeh *2 , Kobra Karimpor3
1- Department of Foundations of Curriculum Development, Research Institute for Education, Organization of Research and Educational Planning, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Counseling and Family Education, Research Institute for Education, Organization of Research and Educational Planning, Tehran, Iran
3- Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (900 Views)
Background and Purpose: The expansion of smart technologies has transformed the patterns of moral education among children within the family, school, and society, confronting the educational system with new opportunities and challenges in moral development. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-synthesize existing research on the role of smart technologies in children’s moral development, with an emphasis on education and upbringing, and on providing an analytical framework in this field.
Method: This study was a systematic review employing a meta-synthesis approach, conducted by the PRISMA guidelines and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) criteria. A comprehensive search was performed across Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Google Scholar, and covered the period from 2010 to 2025. The search was conducted using key terms related to children, artificial intelligence, smart technologies, moral concepts, and qualitative methods, combined with the Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 13 eligible studies were selected. Data were analyzed using the thematic synthesis approach of Thomas and Harden in three stages—open, descriptive, and analytical coding—with the aid of MAXQDA version 2024.
Results: Based on the identified codes, three analytical themes and eleven descriptive subthemes were extracted. The first analytical theme concerned opportunities for learning and moral development in interaction with smart technologies, encompassing issues such as anthropomorphism and the attribution of mind and emotion to smart systems, moral responsibility and accountability, ambiguity at the human–technology boundary, notions of justice, fairness, and honesty, moral growth and value learning, and the positive educational functions of smart technologies. The second analytical theme addressed moral and educational risks, highlighting children’s multidimensional vulnerabilities, their increasing trust and dependence on technology, and the blurred or conflicting educational roles of parents and teachers. The third analytical theme focused on macro-‌level frameworks and contextual factors, emphasizing the influence of cultural and developmental differences as well as theoretical and policy frameworks related to ethics and smart technologies.
Conclusion: Children’s interactions with smart technologies have a dual nature, demanding a critical, context-sensitive, and developmentally informed approach. The development of child-centered ethical frameworks, the enhancement of digital and moral literacy, and the active involvement of parents and educators are essential for ensuring the safe and constructive use of smart technologies. The findings of this study can contribute to strengthening moral education within Iran’s educational system—where the integration of smart technologies has become an inseparable part of teaching, learning, and moral development.
Article number: 6
Keywords: Smart technologies, artificial intelligence, ethics, children, systematic review, meta-synthesis
Full-Text [PDF 1760 kb]   (327 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/10/5 | Accepted: 2025/11/8 | Published: 2025/11/8
References
1. Hesampour F, Rezaei AM. The Role of Academic Motivation, Academic Emotions, and Moral Intelligence in Predicting Students' Academic Performance. J Child Ment Health. 2024; 10 (4): 78-63. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.10.4.6]
2. Hesampour F, Rezaei A M. Predicting Students' Academic Flourishing based on the Moral Intelligence: The Mediating Role of Academic Motivation, Academic Emotions, Academic Procrastination and Academic Burnout. J Child Ment Health. 2023; 10 (2): 83-103. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.61186/jcmh.10.2.7]
3. Khajeh Hosseini H, Farrokhi N, Asadzadeh H. Comparison of Moral Reasoning among Students with and without Visual Impairment. J Child Ment Health. 2019; 6 (2): 194-204. [Persian]. [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.6.2.17]
4. Piaget J. The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press; 1965. [Link]
5. Kohlberg L. The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row; 1981. [Link]
6. Flatebø S, Tran VNN, Wang CEA, Bongo LA. Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2024;19(5): e0303704. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303704]
7. Szczuka JM, Strathmann C, Szymczyk N, Mavrina L, Krämer NC. How do children acquire knowledge about voice assistants? A longitudinal field study on children's knowledge about how voice assistants store and process data. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2022; 33:100460. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100460]
8. UNICEF. Policy guidance on AI for children. Version 2.0. New York: UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy; 2021. [Link]
9. Andries V, Robertson J. Alexa doesn't have that many feelings: children's understanding of AI through interactions with smart speakers in their homes. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023; 5: 100176. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100176]
10. Dangol A, Zhao R, Wolfe R, Ramanan T, Kientz JA, Yip J. "AI just keeps guessing": Using ARC puzzles to help children identify reasoning errors in generative AI. In: Proceedings of the 24th Interaction Design and Children Conference. 2025; 444-464. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3713043.3728836]
11. Collyer-Hoar G, Rubegni E, Malinverni L, Yip J. "It's kind of weird talking to a sphere": exploring children's hopes and fears on social robot morphology using speculative research methods. In: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2024; 276-288. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3643834.3661526]
12. Jiao J, Afroogh A, Rosner G. LLMs and childhood safety: ethical risks and safeguards for generative AI in children's lives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11242. 2025. [Link]
13. Ethical Considerations from Child-Robot Interactions in Under-Resourced Contexts S, Krahmer E, Swerts M. Child-robot interaction across cultures: how does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? Comput Human Behav. 2014; 40: 86-100. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.043]
14. Manzi F, Peretti G, Di Dio C, Itakura S, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Marchetti A. Cross-cultural moral judgments and emotions in preschoolers: human and robot transgressions in Japan and Italy. Behav Inf Technol. 2025; 44(14): 1-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2025.2477779]
15. McStay McStay A, Rosner G. Emotional artificial intelligence in children's toys and devices: ethics, governance and practical remedies. Big Data Soc. 2021; 8(1):1-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/2053951721994877]
16. Adams Adams C, Pente P, Lemermeyer G, Rockwell G. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023; 4:100131. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131]
17. UNESCO. Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. [Link]
18. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(10):1435-1443. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1049732312452938]
19. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372 (71): 1-9. [Link]
20. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12 (181): 1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181]
21. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8 (45): 1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45]
22. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8]
23. Berson IR, Berson MJ, Luo W. Innovating responsibly: ethical considerations for AI in early childhood education. AI Brain Child. 2025; 1(2): 1-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s44436-025-00003-5]
24. Kosoy E, Jeong S, Sinha A, Gopnik A, Kraljic T. Children's mental models of generative visual and text-based AI models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13081. 2024. [Link]
25. Livingstone S, Blum-Ross A. Parenting for a digital future: how hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/oso/9780190874698.001.0001]
26. Malinverni L, Schaper MM, Rubegni E, Tamashiro MA. Scaffolding children's critical reflection on intelligent technologies: opportunities from speculative fiction. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2025; 43:100727. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100727]
27. Sharma Sharma S, Iivari N, Ventä-Olkkonen L, Hartikainen H, Kinnula M. Inclusive child-centered AI: employing design futuring for inclusive design of inclusive AI by and with children in Finland and India. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08041. 2023. [Link]
28. Schmuecker S, Hourcade JP, Alper M, Fails JA, Kawas S, Yarosh S. Democratizing the ethics of emerging technologies for children. Interactions. 2024; 31(5): 32-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3686703]
29. Dwivedi U, Elsayed-Ali S, Bonsignore E, Kacorri H. Examining the values reflected by children during AI problem formulation. arXiv [Preprint]. 2023 Sep 27 [cited 2025 Sep 27]. [Link]
30. Chubb J, Missaoui S, Concannon S, Maloney L, Walker JA. Interactive storytelling for children: A case-study of design and development considerations for ethical conversational AI. Int J Child Comput Interact. 2022; 32:100403. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100403]
31. Rubegni, E., Malinverni L, Yip J. "Don't let the robots walk our dogs, but it's ok for them to do our homework": Children's perceptions, fears, and hopes in social robots. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 2022; New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. 352-361. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3501712.3529726]
32. Quander K, Milky TR, Aponte N, Caceres Carrascal N, Woodward J. "Are you smart?": Children's understanding of "smart" technologies. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 2024; New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. 625-638. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3628516.3655787]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hassani M, Yeganeh T, Karimpor K. Representation of the role of smart technologies in the moral development of children with an emphasis on education and upbringing: a systematic meta-synthesis. J Child Ment Health 2025; 12 (3) : 6
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1541-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 3 (Vol12 No3 Fall 2025- 2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.23 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4735