[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 6, Issue 3 (Vol6 No3 Fall 2019 - 2019) ::
jcmh 2019, 6(3): 1-14 Back to browse issues page
Planning and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Behavioral Intervention on Reducing Physical Bullying and Improving School Bonding in Students: A School-Based Perspective
Mina Mohebbi, Mirmahmoud Mirnasab, Eskandar Fathiazar , Touraj Hashemi
Department of Education, Faculty of Education & Psychology, University of Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (3102 Views)
Background and Purpose: School bullying has been regarded as a serious concern in schools worldwide. Thus, it is critical for researchers and psychologists to use effective intervention strategies to manage bullying behaviors in the schools. Bullying intervention requires taking a school-based approach in which bullies, peers, and teachers are engaged. The present study aimed to plan and evaluate the effectiveness of school-based behavioral intervention on students bullying behavior and school bonding.
Method: This study was a quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest control group design. The participants were 30 bully students, 15 pro-bully students, and four fifth-grade teachers of governmental primary schools in Tabriz city in the academic year 2016-2017.  They were selected by purposeful sampling, one-stage cluster sampling, and screening procedures. Measurement instruments included the Peer Nomination Form (Pekarik et al., 1976), Teacher Nomination Form (Werthamer-Larsson et al., 1991), Pro-bully Nomination Form (Salmivalli et al., 1996), Illinois Bullying Scale (Espelage & Holt, 2001), and School Bonding Scale (Cernkovich & Giordano, 1992). In addition 8 one-hour sessions of school-based behavioral intervention was conducted for 8 week. Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was used to analyze the data.
Results: The results revealed that school-based behavioral intervention can reduce bullying and fighting and improve teacher and school attachment and school involvement among bully students (p>0.001, F=9.78).
Conclusion: The results indicate that school-based behavioral intervention through the behavior management training to bullies, teachers and pro-bullies is effective in reducing components of bullying behavior and improving components of school bonding and can be used as an appropriate intervention procedure for children with physical bullying behavior. In addition, the results of this study can help the school counselors, education psychologists, and teachers to improve children school bonding.
Keywords: School bonding, bullying, school-based behavioral intervention
Full-Text [PDF 853 kb]   (509 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/04/4 | Accepted: 2018/09/3 | Published: 2019/11/9
1. Olweus D. School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annu Rev Clin Psychol.2013; 9: 751-780. [Link] [DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516]
2. Silva MAI, Pereira B, Mendonça D, Nunes B, Oliveira WA. The involvement of girls and boys with bullying: an analysis of gender differences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10(12): 6820-6831. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph10126820]
3. Salmivalli C, Lagerspetz K, Bjöorkqvist K, Österman K, Kaukiainen A. Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their reactions to social status within the group. Aggress Behav. 1996; 22(1): 1-15. [Link] https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:13.0.CO;2-T]
4. Obermann M. Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. J Sch Violence. 2011; 10(3): 239-257. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/15388220.2011.578276]
5. Cho S, Lee JM. Explaining physical, verbal, and social bullying among bullies, victims of bullying, and bully-victims: assessing the integrated approach between social control and lifestyles-routine activities theories. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018; 91: 372-382. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.018]
6. Thornberg R, Jungert T. Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. J Adolesc. 2013; 36(3): 475-483. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003]
7. Ramya, SG, Kulkarni ML. Bullying among school children: prevalence and association with common symptoms in childhood. Indian J Pediatr. 2011; 78(3): 307-310. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12098-010-0219-6]
8. AlBuhairan F, Abbas OA, Sayed DL, Badri M, Alshahri S, Vries N. The relationship of bullying and physical violence to mental health and academic performance: a cross-sectional study among adolescents in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2017; 4(2): 61-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpam.2016.12.005]
9. Elliott SN, Hwang Y-S, Wang J. Teachers' ratings of social skills and problem behaviors as concurrent predictors of students' bullying behavior. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2019; 60:119-126. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.appdev.2018.12.005]
10. Chan HCO, Wong DSW. The overlap between school bullying perpetration and victimization: assessing the psychological, familial, and school factors of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. J Child Fam Stud. 2015; 24(11): 3224-3234. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10826-015-0125-7]
11. Mohebbi M, Mirnasab M, Wiener J. Parental and school bonding in Iranian adolescent perpetrators and victims of bullying. Sch Psychol Int. 2016; 37(6): 583-605. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0143034316671989]
12. Pabian S, Vandebosch H. Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents' (cyber) bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers. Int J Behav Dev. 2016; 40(2): 162-172. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0165025415573639]
13. Oelsner J, Lippold MA, Greenberg MT. Factors influencing the development of school bonding among middle school students. J Early Adolesc. 2011; 31(3): 463-487. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0272431610366244]
14. Moon B, Alarid LF. School bullying, low self-control and opportunity. J Interpers Violence. 2015; 30(5): 839-856. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0886260514536281]
15. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press; 1990, pp: 1-316. [Link]
16. Hirschi T. Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, Berkeley; 1969, pp: 1-309.[Link]
17. Chan HCO, Chui WH. Social bonds and school bullying: a study of Macanese male adolescents on bullying perpetration and peer victimization. Child Youth Care Forum. 2013; 42(6): 599-616. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10566-013-9221-2]
18. Cuffy SA. Principals' perceptions of the bully busters program in combating cyber bullying in elementary schools [Doctoral Thesis]. [Washington, USA]: Education Faculty, Walden University; 2015, pp: 1-129. [Link]
19. Limber SP, Olweus D, Wang W, Masiello M, Breivik K. Evaluation of the Olweus bullying prevention program: a large scale study of US students in grades 3-11. J Sch Psychol. 2018; 69: 56-72.[Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004]
20. Nocentini A, Menesini E. KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy: evidence of effectiveness in a randomized control trial. Prev Sci. 2016; 17(8): 1012-1023. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0690-z]
21. Kärnä A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Alanen E, Salmivalli C. Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; 79(6): 796-805. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/a0025740]
22. Ross SW, Horner RH. Bully prevention in positive behavior support: preliminary evaluation of third-fourth-, and fifth-grade attitudes toward bullying. J Emot Behav Disord. 2014; 22(4): 225-236. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1063426613491429]
23. Lynch D, Keenan M. The good behavior game: maintenance effects. Int J Educ Res. 2018; 87: 91-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.005]
24. Wallace MD, Iwata BA, Hanley GP, Thompson RH, Roscoe EM. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012; 45(4): 709-719. [Link] [DOI:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-709]
25. Heron TE, Heward WL, Cooper JO. Applied behavior analysis. Pearson Education; 2013, pp: 1-800. [Link]
26. Cole CL, Bambara LM. Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions in the schools. School Psych Rev. 1992; 21(2): 193-201. [Link]
27. Kern L, Ringdahl JE, Hilt A, Sterling-Turner HE. Linking self-management procedures to functional analysis results. Behavioral Disorders. 2001; 26(3): 214-226. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/019874290102600304]
28. Brooks A, Todd AW, Tofflemoyer S, Horner RH. Use of functional assessment and a self-management system to increase academic engagement and work comple‌tion. ‎ J Posit Behav Interv. 2003; 5(3): 144-152. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/10983007030050030301]
29. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century; 1938, pp: 1-457. [Link]
30. Hansen BD, Wills HP, Kamps DM, Greenwood CR. The effects of function-based self-management interventions on student behavior. J Emot Behav Disord. 2014; 22(3): 149-159. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1063426613476345]
31. Allen KP. Classroom management, bullying, and teacher practices. Professional Educator. 2010; 34(1): 1-15. [Link]
32. Broussard C, Northup J. The use of functional analysis to develop peer interventions for disruptive classroom behavior. Sch Psychol Q. 1997; 12(1): 65-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/h0088948]
33. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 7th Edition. London: Routledge; 2011, pp: 1-762. [Link]
34. Pekarik EG, Prinz RJ, Liebert DE, Weintraub S, Neale JM. The pupil evaluation inventory. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976; 4(1): 83-97. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF00917607]
35. Pouwels JL, Lansu TA, Cillessen AH. Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria. Aggress Behav. 2016; 42(3):239-253. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ab.21614]
36. Werthamer-Larsson L, Kellam S, Wheeler L. Effect of first-grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. Am J Community Psychol. 1991; 19(4): 585-602. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF00937993]
37. Goossens FA, Olthof T, Dekker PH. New participant role scales: comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggress Behav. 2006; 32(4): 343-357. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ab.20133]
38. Espelage DL, Holt MK. Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse. 2001; 2(2-3): 123-142. [Link] [DOI:10.1300/J135v02n02_08]
39. ChalmehR. Psychometrics properties of the ilinois bullying scale (IBS) in Iranian students: validity, reliability and factor structure. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods. 2014; 3(11): 39-52. [Persian]. [Link]
40. Cernkovich SA, Giordano PC. School bonding, race and delinquency.Criminology. 1992; 30(2): 261-291. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01105.x]
41. Alberto P, Troutman AC. Applied behavior analysis for teachers. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2009, pp: 1-480. [Link]
42. Parsonson BS. Evidence-based classroom behavior management strategies. Kairaranga. 2012; 13(1): 16-23. [Link]
43. Caravita SCS, Blasio PD, Salmivalli C. Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Soc Dev. 2009; 18(1): 140-163. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohebbi M, Mirnasab M, Fathiazar E, Hashemi T. Planning and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Behavioral Intervention on Reducing Physical Bullying and Improving School Bonding in Students: A School-Based Perspective. jcmh. 2019; 6 (3) :1-14
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-459-en.html

Volume 6, Issue 3 (Vol6 No3 Fall 2019 - 2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4144