[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 2 (Vol7 No2 Summer 2020- 2020) ::
J Child Ment Health 2020, 7(2): 17-30 Back to browse issues page
Psychometric Properties of the Home Executive Functions Environment (HEFE) Questionnaire
Sakineh Soltani Kouhbanani *1 , Somayeh Zarenezhad2 , Maryam Bordbar1
1- Department of Educational Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
2- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (3084 Views)
Background and Purpose: The environment in which a child lives plays an important role in the physical, mental, and well-being of the child. The child's home environment and parental teaching are among factors that have a pivotal role in the child's cognitive function. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the home environment questionnaire based on executive functions in Mashhad.
Method: The present study was a developmental research method. The sample of the study consisted of three hundred 8 to 12-year-old students (103 girls and 197 boys) in Mashhad in the academic year of 2019-20 academic year, who were selected using the cluster sampling method. The participants completed the Home Environment Executive Functions (HEFE) Questionnaire (Kurako et al, 2018) and the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale--Children and Adolescents (BDEFS-CA) (2012). The reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha method in SPSS software and the construct validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis in Lisrel software. Moreover, the convergent validity was checked using the correlation method between two questionnaires at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The items of the (HEFE) Questionnaire suggested that 5 subscales of this tool, i.e. control discipline ,stimulation, sensitivity responsivity, warmth and specific activities, had desirable fitness. Also, Cronbach's alpha ​​for the total score of the (HEFE) Questionnaire was estimated at 0.75. For the subscales of control discipline, stimulation, sensitivity responsivity, warmth, and specific activities, this value was 0.75, 0.68, 0.78, 0.81, and 0.83.
Conclusion: Based on the obtained factors, the findings of the study revealed that the HEFE Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing cognitive development activities between parents and children.
Keywords: Home environment, executive functions, Psychometric properties
Full-Text [PDF 1191 kb]   (1700 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/03/9 | Accepted: 2020/06/11 | Published: 2020/09/12
References
1. Mirzaei F, Hossein Khanzadeh A. A, Asghari F, Shakerinia I. The Role of Family Cohesion in Prediction of Aggressive Behaviors of Children. jcmh. 2015; 2 (2):73-84. . [Persian] [Link]
2. Melhuish E, Phan M, Sylva K, Sammons P, Siraj-Blatchford I, Taggart B. Effects of the Home Learning Environment and Preschool Center Experience upon Literacy and Numeracy Development in Early Primary School. Journal of Social. 2008; 2(4): 123-137. [Link]
3. Cole J. A research review: The importance of families and the home environment. London: National Literacy Trust.2011. [Link]
4. Bradley R.H, Burchinal M.R, Casey P.H. Early intervention: The moderating role of the home environment. Applied Developmental Science. 2001; 5: 2-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1207/S1532480XADS0501_1]
5. Hill E.L. Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2004; 8(1): p. 26-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.003]
6. Barkley R. A. Executive functions: What they are, How They Work, and Why They Evolved Guilford Press. 2012. [Link]
7. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013; 64:135-168. [Link] [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750]
8. Roebers CM. Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. Developmental review.2017; 45: 31-51. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.dr.2017.04.001]
9. Bindman S. W, Hindman A. H, Bowles R. P, Morrison F. The contributions of parental management language to executive function in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2013; 28: 529-539. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.03.003]
10. Friedman N. P, Miyake A.Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex. 2017; 86: 186-204. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023]
11. Lonigan C.J, Lerner M.D, Goodrich M.J, Farrington A.L, Allan D. M. Executive function of Spanish-speaking language-minority preschoolers: Structure and relations with early literacy skills and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2016; 144: 46-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.003]
12. Friedman N.P, Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex.2017; 86: 186-204. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023]
13. Young H, Iarocci G. Self and social regulation: Social interaction and the development of social understanding and executive functions New York: Oxford University Press.2012. [Link]
14. Bernier A, Carlson S.M, Deschenes M, Matte-Gagne C. Social factors in the development of early executive functioning: A closer look at the caregiving environment. Developmental Science. 2012; 15:12-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01093.x]
15. Zelazo P.D, Blair C, Willoughby M.T. Executive function: Implications for education Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, and U.S. Department of Education.2016. [Link]
16. Bibok M.B, Carpendale J.I, Muller U. Parental scaffolding and the development of executive function. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2009; 123: 17-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/cd.233]
17. Clark C.A, Sheffield T.D, Chevalier N, Nelson J.M, Wiebe S.A, Espy K.A. Charting early trajectories of executive control with the shape school. Developmental Psychology. 2013; 49:1481-1493. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/a0030578]
18. Blair C, Protzko J, Ursache A. Self-regulation and the development of early literacy. In D. Dickinson, & S. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research. Child Development. 2011; 3: 20-35. New York: Guilford Press. [Link]
19. Fay-Stammbach T, Hawes D J, Meredith P. Parenting influences on executive function in early childhood: A review. Child Development Perspectives. 2014; 8: 258-264. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/cdep.12095]
20. Moos R, Moos B.S. Family environment scale: Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. 1981.[Link]
21. Farahmand S. Hosseinian S. Yazdi M. The Interrelationship between Self-Discipline, Parenting Styles, and High School Student's Academic Achievement in Kermanshah, Journal of Family and Research. 2015; 11(23): 51. [Persian] [Link]
22. Korucu I, Rolan E, Napoli A, Purpura D, Schmitt S. Quarterly Development of the Home Executive Function Environment (HEFE) Scale: Assessing its relation to preschoolers' executive function, Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2019; 47: 9-19. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.09.001]
23. McClelland M. M, Geldhof J, Morrison F, Gestsdottir S, Cameron C, Bowers E, Grammer J.Self-Regulation. In N. Halfon, C. Forrest, R. Lerner, & E. Faustman (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development. Springer Cham. 2018. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_12]
24. Barkley R.A. Barkley Deficits in Executive functioning scale- children and adolescents (BDEFS-CA). nEW York:.2012. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/t37378-000]
25. Soltani kouhbanani S, Zarenezhad S, Soltani Kouhbanani M H, Abazari K. Psychometric Properties of Barkley's Children and Adolescent Functional Performance Scale. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 1397; 8(30): 19-45. [Persian] [Link]
26. Minaei A, Nikzad MA. The Factor Structure and Validity of the Persian Version of theBaumrind Parenting Style Inventory. Journal of Family Research. 2017; 13(1): 91-108. . [Persian] [Link]
27. Snow C E. The theoretical basis for relationships between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 1991; 6(1): 5-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02568549109594817]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soltani Kouhbanani S, Zarenezhad S, Bordbar M. Psychometric Properties of the Home Executive Functions Environment (HEFE) Questionnaire. J Child Ment Health 2020; 7 (2) :17-30
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1022-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 2 (Vol7 No2 Summer 2020- 2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710