[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 1 (Vol12 No1 Spring 2025- 2025) ::
J Child Ment Health 2025, 12(1): 54-67 Back to browse issues page
The effectiveness of choice theory training on academic buoyancy and subjective vitality of students
Taiebeh Yeganeh *
Department of Counseling and Family Education, Research Institute for Education, Organization of Research and Educational planning, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (300 Views)
Background and Purpose: Students are the most crucial part of the educational system of any country. Investigating psychological training aimed at enhancing students’ mental health is considered an essential issue in both developed and developing societies. So, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Choice Theory training on academic buoyancy and mental vitality in students.
Method: This study was applied in terms of purpose and quasi-experimental in nature, employing a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population included male students in the upper elementary grades (second stage of primary school) in Tehran who visited two psychological service centers in the city between July and October 2024. A total of thirty-four students were selected through convenience sampling based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and voluntary participation. They were randomly assigned to an experimental group (15 students) and a control group (17 students). The experimental group received training in Glasser’s Choice Theory (1999) for ten sessions, while the control group did not receive any such training. Data collection instruments included the Academic Buoyancy Scale (ABS; Martin & Marsh, 2008(and the Subjective Vitality Scale (Ryan & Frederick, 1997). Data were analyzed using univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with SPSS version 25.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of academic buoyancy (F = 14.518, p < 0.05) and subjective vitality (F = 5.990, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Based on these results, it can be concluded that Choice Theory helps students make more constructive decisions, thereby enhancing their academic buoyancy and mental vitality.
Article number: 4
Keywords: Choice theory, academic buoyancy, subjective vitality, students
Full-Text [PDF 1437 kb]   (191 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/01/6 | Accepted: 2025/03/16 | Published: 2025/07/2
References
1. Stuber F, Seifried-Dübon T, Rieger MA, Gündel H, Ruhle S, Zipfel S, Junne F. The effectiveness of health-oriented leadership interventions for the improvement of mental health of employees in the health care sector: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(2):203-220. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00420-020-01583-w]
2. Lavrijsen J, Vansteenkiste M, Boncquet M, Verschueren K. Does motivation predict changes in academic achievement beyond intelligence and personality? A multi theoretical perspective. J. Educ. Psychol. 2022;114(4):772-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/edu0000666]
3. Martin AJ, Marsh HW. Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students' everyday academic resilience. J Sch Psychol. 2008;46(1):53-83. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002]
4. Colmar S, Liem G, Connor, & Martin A. Exploring the relationships between academic buoyancy, academic self-concept, and academic performance: a study of mathematics and reading among primary school students. Educ. Psychol. 2019; 39(8): 1068-1089. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2019.1617409]
5. Putwain DW, Jansen In de Wal J, van Alphen T. Academic Buoyancy: Overcoming Test Anxiety and Setbacks. J Intell. 2023;11(3):42. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11030042]
6. Khojasteh Abbasi F, Tarverdi H, & Younesi J. Cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and academic buoyancy: Effects and analysis. IJHS. 2022; 6(3): 4046-4060. [Link] [DOI:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6660]
7. Hirvonen R, Putwain DW, Määttä S, Ahonen T, & Kiuru N. The role of academic buoyancy and emotions in students' learning‐related expectations and behaviors in primary school. BJEP. 2020;90(4), 948-963. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/bjep.12336]
8. Ryan RM, & Frederick C. On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. J Pers.1997; 65(3): 529-565. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x]
9. Strijk JE, Wendel-Vos GCW, Picavet HSJ, Hofstetter H, Hildebrandt VH. Wat is vitaliteit en hoe is het te meten? Kerndimensies van vitaliteit en de Neder landse Vitaliteitsmeter. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen. 2015;93(1):32-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12508-015-0013-y]
10. Lavrusheva O. The concept of vitality. Review of the vitality-related research domain. New Ideas in Psychology. 2020; 56: 100752. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100752]
11. Wörtler B, Van Yperen NW, Mascareño JM, Barelds DPH. The Link Between Employees' Sense of Vitality and Proactivity: Investigating the Moderating Role of Personal Fear of Invalidity. Front Psychol. 2020; 11: 2169. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02169]
12. Ryan RM, & Deci EL. From ego depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Soc. Personal Psychol. Compass.2008; 2(2): 702-717. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x]
13. Muraven M، Gagné M & Rosman H. Helpful self-control: Autonomy support، vitality، and depletion. JESP. 2008; 44(3): 573-585. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.008]
14. Pap Z، Vîrgă D، Notelaers G، & Maricuțoiu L. A multilevel model of job insecurity and engagement. JMP. 2020; 35(7/8): 529-541. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JMP-02-2020-0089]
15. Ying Keat C & Zainal SRM. Moderating Role of Employee Vitality in the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Job Performance. Kurdish Studies. 2024; 12(1) :70-90. [Link]
16. Atwater L, & Carmeli A. Leader-member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. Leadersh. Q. 2009; 20(3): 264-275.‌ [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009]
17. Diri TV، & Don-Baridam LQ. Building Organizational Vitality from the Inside Out: A Human Resource Development Perspective. Smartify: Journal of Smart Education and Pedagogy. 2024; 1(1): 10-27. [Link]
18. Glasser, W. Choice Theory-A New Psychology of Personal Freedom Harper Collins Publishers (1999).‌ [Link]
19. Othman MNH, Jusoh AJ, & Arip MASM. Validity and Reliability of the Choice Theory Reality Therapy Group Guidance Module for School Truancy. IJ-ARPED. 2024; 13(3):3915-3936. [Link] [DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/22403]
20. Casstevens WJ. Using reality therapy and choice theory in health and wellness program development within psychiatric psychosocial rehabilitation agencies. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy. 2010; 29(2): 55.‌ [Link]
21. Peterson AV. 'Choice Theory and Reality Therapy', TCA Journal; 28(1): 41-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/15564223.2000.12034563]
22. Saffari Bidhendi s, Asadzadeh H, Farrokhi n, Dortaj F, Efficacy of Training Self-Compassion on High School Students' School Phobia. Medical Journal of Mashhad university of Medical Sciences.2021; 64(2):3004-3013. [Persian]. [Link]
23. Miloff A, Lindner P, Dafgård P, et al. Automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia vs. in-vivo one-session treatment: A randomized non-inferiority trial. Behav Res Ther. 2019; 118:130-140. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.004]
24. Brysbaert M. How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables. J Cogn. 2019;2(1):16. [Link] [DOI:10.5334/joc.72]
25. Razavi Motlagh SF, Naderi F, Marashian FS, Zargar Shirazi F. Factors affecting academic buoyancy mediated by academic flourishing in female 12th graders in Shiraz, Iran. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education. 2022; 18(4): 101-121. [Persian] [Link]
26. Tanhaye Reshvanloo F, keramati R, kareshki H, Torkamani, M. Factor Structure and Gender Invariance of Subjective Vitality Scale in students. J. Appl. Psychol. Res. 2018; 9(3): 1-14. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yeganeh T. The effectiveness of choice theory training on academic buoyancy and subjective vitality of students. J Child Ment Health 2025; 12 (1) : 4
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1492-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 1 (Vol12 No1 Spring 2025- 2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714