[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
International Editorial Board
Editorial Board of Iranian University
Aims & Scopes
Indexing & Abstracting
Open Access Policy
Financial Policies
CrossMark Policy
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Browse by Authors
Browse by Keywords
For Authors::
Instructions for Authors
Submission Form
Principles of Publishing Ethics
Ethical Code: Psychologic Study
Ethical Code: Medical Research
Ethical Consideration
Peer Review Policy
Declaration Form
Article Processing Charges
For Reviewers::
Policies of Peer Review
Registration::
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
..
Registered in
..
Indexing and Abstracting
..
:: Volume 10, Issue 1 (Vol10 No1 Spring 2023- 2023) ::
J Child Ment Health 2023, 10(1): 78-92 Back to browse issues page
The Comparison of Effects of Computer Cognitive Rehabilitation (ARAM) and Practical Rehabilitation Games (Attention Games) on Working Memory, Response Inhibition, and Reading Comprehention of Students with Dyslexia
Mohammad Derikvand *1 , Manijeh Shahni Yilagh2 , Alireza Hajiyakhchali2
1- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract:   (2274 Views)
Background and Purpose: Dyslexia as one of the most prevalent learning disabilities that may cause problems in other fields academic and failure of primary school students. Thus, the present study was conducted to compare the effect of computer cognitive rehabilitation (ARAM) and practical rehabilitation games (attention games) on working memory, response inhibition, and reading comprehention of students with special learning disorder (dyslexia).
Method: The current research was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test post-test desing that included two experimental group and one control group. The population of this study consisted of all primary school students from second to fifth of Andimeshk City who that are studying in the 2021-2022. Sixty student were selected trough convenient sampling and placced in three groups of 20 people (two experimental groups and one active control group). For the first group, a computerized cognitive rehabilitation game and for the second group, a practical rehabilitation game was performed in 11 sessions of 45 minutes; while the control group did not receive intervention. The three groups in pre-test and post-test, were answered, wechsler working memory Test , Go/no go Test and Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA) and the data from these tools were analyzed using the multivariate covariance analysis and Benferoni's paired comparison test
Results: The results of data analysis showed that cognitive rehabilitation games (computer and practical) improve working memory, response inhibition, and reading comprehention of students with dyslexia (p< 0/05). Also bonferroni test showed that computer rehabilitation is more effective compared to practical games.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, cognitive rehabilitation games (computer and practical) can be used as an afficient method in the treatment of reading learning disorder by consultants and experts.
Article number: 6
Keywords: Cognitive rehabilitation, working memory, response inhibition, reading comprehention, dyslexia
Full-Text [PDF 1188 kb]   (714 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/03/23 | Accepted: 2023/05/17 | Published: 2023/06/21
References
1. Rasouli S, Vahedi S, Gharadaghi A, Nemati S. Developing and validation of intervention program based on multiple learning systems for students with specific learning with reading disabilities: meta-synthesis study. J Child Ment Health. 2022; 9(2): 1-20. http://doi.org/10.52547/jcmh. 9.2.2 [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jcmh.9.2.2]
2. Babu MR, Durgaiah P. Reading habits among Student teachers in relation to their age, gender and management. The International Journal of Indian Psychology. 2016; 3(4): 170-176. http://doi.org/10.25215/0304.149 [Link] [DOI:10.25215/0304.149]
3. Al-Rimawi S, Al Masri A. The level of reading comprehension skills of students with learning disabilities in Jordan. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 2022; 12(1): 234-245. (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/ by- nc/4.0/) [Link] [DOI:10.36941/jesr-2022-0019]
4. Nicolson RI, Fawcett AJ. Development of dyslexia the delayed neural commitment framework. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2019; 13: 1-16. http://doi.org/10.3389/.2019.00112 [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00112]
5. Kuhl U, Neef NE, Kraft I, Schaadt G, Dörr L, Brauer J, Czepezauer I, Müller B, Wilcke A, Kirsten H, Emmrich F. The emergence of dyslexia in the developing brain. Neuroimage. 2020; 2(11): 1-11. http://doi.org. 10.1016/2020.116633 [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116633]
6. Afshari, A, Rezaei, R. The effectiveness of Sand Smart software on executive functions (focused attention, the ability to organize and plan, and auditory and visual work memory) in students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2019; 8(3): 26-48. [Persian] http://doi.org. 10.22098/JLD.2019.787 [Link]
7. Gray S, Fox AB, Green S, Alt M, Hogan TP, Petscher Y, Cowan N. Working memory profiles of children with dyslexia, developmental language disorder, or both. J Speech Hear Res. 2019; 62(6): 39-58. http://doi.org. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0148 [Link] [DOI:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0148]
8. Taghizadeh H, Soltani A, Manzari Tavakoli H, Zeinaddiny Maymand Z. The structural model of the role of executive functions in learning performance of students with specific learning disabilities. J Child Ment Health. 2017; 4 (2): 25-36. URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-205-en.html [Link]
9. Schworer EK, Esbensen AJ, Fidler DJ, Beebe DW, Carle A, Wiley S. Evaluating working memory outcome measures for children with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022; 66(1): 195-211. http://doi.org. 10.1111/jir.12833 [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jir.12833]
10. Ortega Jiménez NR, López V, Carrasco Chaparro X, Escobar MJ, García AM, Parra MA, Aboitiz F. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying working memory encoding and retrieval in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Scientific reports. 2020; 10(1): 1-13. http://doi.org. 10.1038/41598-020-64678 [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-64678-x]
11. Maleki S, Arjmandnia, AA. The role of working memory in learning disorder: By focusing on reading disorder and reviewing the related projects. Rooyesh. 2019; 8(3): 101-112. [Persian].http://doi.org. 20.1001.1.2383353.1398.8.3. 20.0 [Link]
12. van Ede F. Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences. Visual Cognition. Visual Cognition. 2020; 28(5-8):401-413. http://doi.org. 10.1080/13506285.2020.1759744 [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13506285.2020.1759744]
13. Mahdavi Najmabadi Z, Kadivar P, Arjmandnia A, Posheneh K. Investigating the relationship between Visual- spatial Processing and working memory with creativity and math anxiety: mediation of math self-efficacy and social intelligence. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science. 2020; 9(4): 1-34. [Link]
14. Novaes CB, Zuanetti PA, Fukuda MT. Effects of working memory intervention on students with reading comprehension difficulties. Revista CEFAC. 2019; 21(4): 1-11. http://doi.org. 10.1590/1982-0216/201921417918 [Link] [DOI:10.1590/1982-0216/201921417918]
15. Xu P, Wu D, Chen Y, Wang Z, Xiao W. The effect of response inhibition training on risky decision-making task performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; (11): 1-9. http://doi.org. 10.3389/.2020.01806 [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01806]
16. Nouwens S, Groen MA, Kleemans T, Verhoeven L. How executive functions contribute to reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2021; 91(1):169-192. http://doi.org. 10.1111/bjep.12355 [Link] [DOI:10.1111/bjep.12355]
17. Borella E, De Ribaupierre A. The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences. 2014; 1(34): 86-92. http://doi.org. 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001 [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001]
18. Petretto DR, Masala C. Dyslexia and specific learning disorders: new international diagnostic criteria. J Child Dev Disord. 2017; 3(4): 1-5. http://doi.org.10.4172/2472-1786 .100057 [Link]
19. Kasyani N, Zarei H A. Relationship between reading literacy with mathematical and science performance of female students in timss test. Psychological Science. 2019; 18(74):257-264. [Persian]. http://doi.org. 20.1001.1.1735 7462.1398.18.74.9.6 [Link]
20. Tan MS, Amiel JJ. Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: Case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education. 2019; 48(1): 70-87. http://doi.org. 10.1080/ 19415257.2019.1689522 [Link] [DOI:10.1080/19415257.2019.1689522]
21. Bergo E, Lombardi G, Pambuku A, Della Puppa A, Bellu L, D'avella D, Zagonel V. Cognitive rehabilitation in patients with gliomas and other brain tumors: state of the art. BioMed research international. 2016; 1-11. http://doi.org. 10.1155/2016/3041824 [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2016/3041824]
22. Abbasi Fashami N, Akbari B, Hossein khanzadeh AA. Comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback on improving the executive functions in childrens with dyslexia. Journal of Child Mental Health. 2020; 7(2): 294-311. [Persian] http://doi.org. 10.29252/.7. 2.25 [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jcmh.7.2.25]
23. Movahedi Y. The effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation treatment on improving the performance of response inhibition in students with learning disabilities in math and dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2020
24. 9(2): 132-152. [Persian] http://doi.org. 10.22098/ 2020.860 [Link]
25. Radfar F, Nejati V, Fathababdi J, Layegh H. Effect of attention training on working memory function and reading components in Pupils with dyslexia: A single-subject design study. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2016; 26(142): 194-212. [Persian] URL: http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article -1-8800-en.html [Link]
26. Salas-Gomez D, Fernandez-Gorgojo M, Pozueta A, Diaz-Ceballos I, Lamarain M, Perez C, Kazimierczak M, Sanchez-Juan P. Physical activity is associated with better executive function in university students. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; (14): 1-8. http://doi.org.10.3389/2020. 00011 [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00011]
27. Ayarrezaie, F, Sameri M. The effectiveness of accuracy training on reading ability of dyslexic students in third basic elementary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2019; 8(3): 91-111. [Persian] http://doi.org. 10.22098/jld.2019. 790 [Link]
28. Hemati Almdarloo G, Tavakoli F. The efficacy of attention plays on reading performance of female students with dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2020; 17(40): 34-53. http://doi.org. 10.22111/.2021.5897 [Link]
29. Raven J. The Raven's progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive psychology. 2000; 41(1): 1-48. http://doi.org. 10.1006/cogp.1999.0735 [Link] [DOI:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735]
30. Vestberg T, Reinebo G, Maurex L, Ingvar M, Petrovic P. Core executive functions are associated with success in young elite soccer players. PloS one. 2017; 12(2):1-13. http://doi.org. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170845 [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170845]
31. Karami noori R, Moradi A. Reading and dyslexia test (NAMA). Tehran: Jihad University, teacher training. [In persion] [Link]
32. Karimi Lichahi R, Akbari B, Hoseinkhanzadeh AA, Asadi Majreh S. The effect of a multidimensional intervention program (sensory-motor integration training for child and parent) on reading attitudes and performance of students with dyslexia. J Child Ment Health. 2021; 8(2):1-16. http://doi.org. 10.52547/.8.2.1 [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jcmh.8.2.1]
33. Khanjani Z, nazari MA, abravani P. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions in patients with stroke. Clinical Psychology Studies. 2019; 9(34): 197-226. http://doi.org. 10.22054/jcps.2019.38717.2059 [Link]
34. Wodka EL, Mark Mahone E, Blankner JG, Gidley Larson JC, Fotedar S, Denckla MB, Mostofsky SH. Evidence that response inhibition is a primary deficit in ADHD. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007; 29(4): 345-56. http://doi.org. 10.1080/13803390600678046 [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13803390600678046]
35. Robatmili S, Borjali A, Alizadeh H, Nokni M, Farokhi N. Computer- assisted cognitive rehabilitation for response inhibition in children with ADHD (inattentive presentation). Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2015; 5(19): 1-126. [Persian]. [Link]
36. Farzadi F, Behroozi N, Shahni Yilagh M, Omidian M. The effect of chucky & nelly cognitive game on hot and cold executive function skills in order to develop school readiness skills in preschool children. J Child Ment Health. 2022; 9(1): 32-52. http://doi.org. 10.52547/jcmh.9.1.4 [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jcmh.9.1.4]
37. Schulz KP, Fan J, Magidina O, Marks DJ, Hahn B, Halperin JM. Does the emotional go/no-go task really measure behavioral inhibition? Convergence with measures on a non-emotional analog. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22(2): 151-160. http://doi.org. 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.001 [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.001]
38. Maghsudloo M, Nejati V, Fathabadi J. Effectiveness of ARAM cognitive rehabilitation package on improvement of executive function based on behavioral rating in preschool children with ADHD symptoms. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2019; 9(33): 23-43. http://doi.org. 10.22054/jpe.2019.31691.1769 [Link]
39. Mostafaie A, Oraki M, Niknam A. The effect of attention-based games on the self-regulatory and executive function of anxious students. Neuropsychology. 2018; 4(14): 111-128. http://doi.org. http://doi: 10.30473/clpsy.2018.41812. 1354 [Link]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Derikvand M, Shahni Yilagh M, Hajiyakhchali A. The Comparison of Effects of Computer Cognitive Rehabilitation (ARAM) and Practical Rehabilitation Games (Attention Games) on Working Memory, Response Inhibition, and Reading Comprehention of Students with Dyslexia. J Child Ment Health 2023; 10 (1) : 6
URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-1252-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 1 (Vol10 No1 Spring 2023- 2023) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710